Well, we knew it was only a matter of a time. A formal petition has been filed to remove Groves, Texas city councilman Cross Coburn from office.
His crime? Being gay and having a Grindr profile.
The trouble started back in March after someone leaked 19-year-old Coburn’s private Grindr photos and conversations, sending them to City Hall and a local media outlet along with an anonymous note that said:
Is this in any way proper behavior of a councilman to represent himself online or a ‘dating’ app? I felt the city council should be made aware of the situation.
On Friday, William Howlett filed the paperwork to try and have Coburn, who was first elected back in February, ousted from office.
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
Howlett’s petition, which is laced with subtle hints of homophobia, reads:
Thank you to all the members of the Groves City Council. Each one of you has accepted the huge responsibility of making decisions that affect our community, and I’m confident that you all take this responsibility seriously. Unfortunately, one member, Mr. Cross Coburn, has publicly demonstrated actions unbecoming a Public Official, compromising the integrity of his office, and fracturing the trust of the citizens of Groves. Therefore I, William L. Howlett, wish to initiate a recall petition to remove Cross Coburn from the Ward 1 Groves Councilmember position.
The “actions unbecoming a Public Official”, of course, is being an openly gay man with a Grindr profile.
Related: Someone sent this city councilman’s private Grindr pics to City Hall
Howlett has 20 days to collect signatures from 10 percent of the city’s registered voters, or about 950 signatures, to have Coburn recalled.
Meanwhile, Coburn has vowed to fight the effort and insists he’s done nothing wrong. And he’s right! He hasn’t. There are absolutely no laws against elected officials having Grindr profiles.
He’s hired a lawyer to help explore his legal options as well and Boston-based political consultant Jonathan Scott to help manage the scandal.
Scott tells a local news outlet the whole thing has been a political attack against a smart young politician who, by no coincidence, happens to be gay.
“We found it unfortunate that a political opponent chose to politicize this in a negative way after an injustice was done against Councilman Coburn,” he said. “Ws far as the petition goes, we are in a holding pattern. There is a lot of detail that needs to be paid attention to when one presses a recall election.”
As for Coburn, he’s not letting the scandal distract it from the job he was elected to do.
“I want to work on fixing our roads and cleaning up debris,” he tells his local TV station. “I plan on getting a group of volunteers together and going on my own to streets and houses that need help and pick up debris left over from this hurricane.”
When asked if he has any plans to resign, Coburn says, simply: “No, I’m not going to.”
Related: City councilman fights back after his raunchy Grindr pics were leaked to City Hall
Lacuevaman
is everything now accepted in the trump era?
Kangol
Not if you’re a Democrat. It’s only OK if you’re a Republican (IOKIYAR). If this young man publicly praises Jesus and Trump, he probably can keep his office. You know, Be Best!
Vince
Geez. Well it is Texas After all. More churches than common sense.
JK 1984
This just has me shaking my head. So being gay and having (or trying to have) an active sex life makes you unqualified to serve the public in this guys opinion?
What I think is sad is being Texas he may actually get enough signatories to recall/remove the city councilman from office.
djmcgamester
This article is fairly weak. It leaps right to “openly gay man who has a Grindr account” when it’s almost certainly the having a Grindr account that’s at issue. Also, I don’t think trying to have an active sex life is at issue. Their problem is with the venue. I don’t but that argument, either, but I think the article goes to extreme lengths to make it sound like homophobia. Maybe they are homophobic but I don’t think anything quoted necessarily suggests it, subtle or otherwise.
galatians328
Sorry, but elected officials must be held to a high standard. It is not therefore about a private person ‘trying to have an active sex life’. He is AN ELECTED official. And Isn’t this the same argument many are claiming about Trump’s ‘active sex life’?
joxx67
This is the 21st century! Why should there be a problem with Grindr? Texas homophobia at its worst. Amerikkka!
Creamsicle
I reserve judgement until I see the profile pic and bio.
Grindr is what you choose to make of it. His profile could be anything from a selfie saying that he likes hiking and coffee, to the classic “no fats, no femmes, no asians,” to asking for completely anonymous sex.
Just treating grindr like a dating site is not conduct unbecoming of a City Council member, but the latter two behaviors would be disqualifying to most constituents, but that ijudgement s up to those voters. The only thing that makes grindr a hookup app is the attitude that people bring to it and the expectation that guys are only there to hook up and not to actually date.
Tombear
Why is it that several fundamentalist and Evangelical pastors have been caught on Grindr and forgiven yet a gay politician caught on Grindr is condemned?