According to scientists, 95% of the population wants to be in a relationship. OK, OK. I’m just guessing. I’m not a scientist. But, in all fairness, it seems like that’s what everyone wants. Including me.
In addition to being autistic (which I’ve written about before), I’m also demiromantic. It’s taken me 10 years to realize that.
Being demiromantic (or demisexual) means that you can only feel romantically attracted to someone after there is a strong emotional connection.
In other words, I don’t fall in love easily.
I can be physically attracted to someone, but in order to feel drawn to them in a more meaningful way, I also need to love what’s in their mind and heart.
Even though I just recently realized this about myself, when I look back on my childhood, the signs were always there. The only truly strong connection I ever had was with another boy in middle school. I’ll call him Tyler.
Every year, our history teacher would take the entire eighth grade class on a week-long trip to the East coast. We were assigned roommates who we would share a hotel room with. Low and behold, Tyler was my roommate.
I was excited! I didn’t know why at the time, but I felt drawn to him. He had a charming personality and was always cordial. He was also a loner, like me. So I felt like I could bond with him.
After a long day of travel, we ended up at our first hotel of the trip. That night, we talked about our interests (my favorite point of conversation). At the time, I was really into theater and was always performing around Temecula, where I grew up.
He looked at me and said, “You know, I think it’s cool you do theater. I could never do that. It takes courage. I like that about you.” At that moment, I fell in love.
Sadly, he was straight, and we were only 14, so nothing ever happened. But it would take another 10 years for me to find another person like him.
For a few years now, I’ve been friends with a guy who I used to work with at a local coffee shop. I’ll call him Mike. We immediately hit it off, and we kept in contact even after he moved from Temecula to northern California.
About a year ago, Mike moved back, and we picked up where we left off. I invited him to a local brewery one night and we got into a lot of personal subjects–from life and career goals, to love and sex.
It was probably the most real conversation I’ve ever had with a guy. What stood out to me was his willingness to share. I never had a guy be so open with me, so I knew that our relationship had to be special.
As time went on, Mike and I ran into each other at other places around town and continued our open and, from my perspective, flirty relationship. I never could quite pinpoint whether he was interested in me, but my feelings for him grew stronger.
Once again, I fell in love.
Finally, I decided to confront it head on, which is something I never do. I invited him to a coffee shop one morning. After an hour of trying to find the right time to mention it, I told him Mike had feelings for him and asked him out.
That’s when he told me he was straight.
I’m not going to lie, I was crushed. When I thought about it later, however, something clicked. Over the years, I never dated, but did have casual sex with various partners, none of whom I was ever romantically interested in. It was always just about the release.
As I got older, I started to notice what this was doing to me emotionally and spiritually. By only approaching sex with the expectation of an immediate result and nothing more, I was missing something.
Then a while ago, my best friend from college and I were talking about relationships and they said, “Weird question, but are you aromantic? I get that vibe from you.”
As I did the work on exploring this idea of demiromanticism, things started to make a lot of sense. I realized that the only times I had ever been open to love (first to Tyler, and then to Mike), were when I wasn’t having sex.
As a gay man, I’ve had to deal with living to heteronormative expectations, such as settling down with a family and having a traditional career. As an autistic man, I’ve had to live up to neurotypical expectations, like how to approach sex, love, and dating.
In my experience, it has taken me longer as an autistic person to grasp the concept of love. And combining all these facets can be exhausting. But I believe love will happen for me. I’m just waiting for my Prince Charming.
Even though I haven’t been in a relationship yet, I know he’s out there waiting to sweep me off my feet.
And I’ll be ready when he gets here.
Related:
I’m gay, autistic, and horny. Here’s what you should know before we date…
If you have a potential partner on the autism spectrum, here are some tidbits to take into consideration…
GlobeTrotter
“Being demiromantic (or demisexual) means that you can only feel romantically attracted to someone after there is a strong emotional connection.”
Eh? Doesn’t this describe like half of all men and 90% of women? Does this common phenomenon have to be celebrated as a “sexuality”?
This type of forced identity politics is not only stupid, but it promotes unnecessary division and is very detrimental to our mental health. This is doubly true for young and impressionable individuals.
By the way, everything the author of this article describes can be summed up in one word: “anxiety”. Has nothing to do with “demisexuality” or autism. He just needs to learn how to master his fears and moderate his expectations – something WE ALL had to learn at some point in our lives. Welcome to the club!
Gabby
True Words!
bachy
Globe: You make some great points, but this essay demonstrates exactly what I think is actually useful about contemporary sex/gender/identity-speak. It can be used as a tool to better understand ourselves and others… a new language that can support ways to connect.
As long as people avoid lopping off body parts to more stringently “fit” nebulous psychosexual terminologies, I think it’s a good thing.
Bosch
“This type of forced identity politics is not only stupid, but it promotes unnecessary division and is very detrimental to our mental health. ”
No, it helps people communicate to potential partners exactly who they are and what they’re looking for, in a manner that can identify certain significant incompatibilities on time. It also helps in recognizing behavioural patterns, making them easier to understand and remedy.
Accurate language transmits accurate information.
GlobeTrotter
Look, the guy simply has some unresolved issues with anxiety, this is not a new sexuality. Untold millions of people either suffer from anxiety or will suffer from it at some point in their lives. No need to create an entirely new sexuality complete with flag, anthem and political movement. All of us went through different stages of anxiety, especially as teenagers, but elevating this to a special form of “sexuality” is silly and reeks of attention-seeking behavior. A few sessions with a skilled counselor or therapist could go a long way to helping the author cope with his anxiety. The last thing he needs is a large audience validating his feelings of victimhood.
bachy
Fair enough.
Bosch
The amplitude of your sexual drive is not a level of anxiety. You’re getting far too hung up on the fact that it uses a dry-sounding word that has its origin in social sciences.
This is what this is for: person A says “I have this type of sexual pattern”. Person B can then respond with, “My sexual pattern is compatible with your sexual pattern. Let’s date.” Or, “I’m sorry, were not going to be a match.”
It’s no different than saying your into polygamy, into bukkake in public, just a side, prude, not sexual at all. You’re turning this into something political, which is ironically an expression of identity politics.
Openminded
Bosch, I can appreciate your point, but what’s wrong with just saying, “I may take a bit longer to fall for you than others”? There’s so many labels out there today that if you tell me you are “——sexual”, I’m likely to be confused and assume penicillin will take care of that.
Fname Optional Lname
THIS!
Ronbo
GT is right.
Intense focus upon “Identity” does more to isolate people than connect people. Identify as “human” to increase your pool of love.
Or… search for the perfect person (mirrors are handy I hear). And… miss all the opportunities for love along the way. Identity politics can be even worse.
Bosch
Yeah, for a fling, no big deal. But if I’m going to date someone with long term intentions, I’d like to know their romantic, sexual, and behavioural patterns, and most importantly, I’d like to know that they know themselves.
inbama
This is why corporate America loves “identity politics.”
Remember “Occupy Wall Street?” The Marginalization Marathon made actual progressive politics disappear.
FreddieW
Yes, saw it firsthand by accident during my first trip to NYC. We were following a map to Battery Park and passed by Zuccotti Park, which was filled with young people needing showers. Did it accomplish anything?
inbama
From the standpoint of reining in income inequality, no.
But at least the Millennials were focused on economics rather than pushing puberty blockers and supporting Hamas.
Man About Town
I can certainly understand the challenges of finding love when you’ll only settle for a threesome with Demi Lovato and Demi Moore.
bachy
giggle
still_onthemark
And everyone gets a demitasse!
Bosch
Wow, “identity politics” has become such a buzzword that all of you are using it incorrectly. This isn’t about a political position, or activism, or social issues; this is about how a person’s identity affects the way in which they connect with other people on a personal level.
You can’t just call it “identity politics” when other people identify with something.
FreddieW
The term that popped into my mind when I read it is “navel-gazing”.
Self awareness is good if it leads you to recognize unhealthy patterns and to make corrections, but it’s detrimental and annoying when carried to an extreme.
GlobeTrotter
@FreddieW: Precisely! The problem with having a myriad of identities is that people feel coerced or pressured into occupying little boxes and think they have to take on certain behaviors because that’s what people in these boxes do. They voluntarily impose a psychosocial straight-jacket onto themselves, believing that this is how a “demisexual” is to supposed to think and act when in reality, this is just a completely normal guy with some unresolved anxiety. But admitting that you have anxiety doesn’t score you extra points – coming out, however, as “demisexual” does. You get a flag, you get your own colors, you get a parade, and you get to write articles detailing your struggle as a sexual minority.
Bosch
@FreddieW self-awareness is also good when it helps you communicate to potential partners what your needs are. For a successful relationship, you absolutely want to find someone with a similar sex drive and similar sexual values to you. Accurate language makes this easier.
@GT “The problem with having a myriad of identities is that people feel coerced or pressured into occupying little boxes”. Incorrect. The benefit of having a “myriad of identities” is that people don’t need to fit into boxes that don’t suit them. The range of sexual expression is much more complex and nuanced than “slut Vs prude”, if people want to name their position on that gradient, let them. Don’t turn it into something political, while at the same time complaining about “identity politics”. Complaining about certain identities is far more political than having one.
FreddieW
@Bosch
Wasn’t that complicated for me. My partner of 18 years was my friend and the 3rd person I told I was gay. We were raised similarly and very close in age. That was all that was necessary beyond mutual attraction and respect. If I had been required to take an internal inventory and interview candidates, I would still be single. You can make positive changes to yourself to make a good relationship last.
Fahd
Be careful or you are likely to wind up alone. Sometimes its better to experiment, safely of course.
Diplomat
I think this is more sex labels than identity politics. I agree with GT that we all go through similar things and that this guy is nothing special so i’d not adhere to his label being necessary. I don’t know that it has anything to do with anxiety. Though not winning in love can sure cause depression.
Autism may be a slow burn to love due to the disease which the author doesn’t cover.
Either way, labels beyond gay bi str8 really don’t do me any good. There’s nothing I can’t find out over a good cup of coffee and an open person accross from me.
Bosch
I find the labels “exhibitionist”, “side”, and “the more the merrier” quite useful.
Diplomat
I’m with ya on the last one for sure. .
Openminded
I’m with Globe and others on this, what’s wrong with getting to know someone inside and out before becoming committed to them? I think the author is using a label as an excuse for his perceived failure. “I can’t find true love because I’m -fill in the blank-. Too many people today are falling into this trap to excuse their not meeting goals or expectations.
ShaverC
This writer wrote an article on July 18 of this year about exploring autism with sex… now he’s not into sex but the mind?
still_onthemark
He just learned the word demisexual and wants to fit himself into that box, as others here put it.
wikidBSTN
Short answer – NOPE.
Fname Optional Lname
“I can’t be emotionally attached until I am emotionally attached”
is my takeaway from this. You’re not unique, you’re not special, you’re difficult and obnoxious.
Diplomat
Transgender is just as obnoxious. Trans Identified male or female would be more accurate seeing as though trans women are men and vica versa.
michel_banen
Another new word, ‘demisexual’. Sounds like yet another rare condition but it means you’re not a slut having sex with anything and everything.
So just basically most people.
Kangol2
Speaking of Occupy Wall Street accomplished more than some think it did. The anti-inequality and anti-corporate discourse of Occupy Wall Street permeates global critiques of capitalism now even more so than in 2011. It has particularly animated large segments of millennials and Gen Z in the US, including people on the right (think about the increased critiques of elites and the establishment that Don the Con glommed onto.)
Some of the groups that took tips from Occupy Wall Street include: the Fight for $15/hour fair wage movement and a reenergized Labor movement, which has had numerous successes this year; #MeToo; Black Lives Matter (BLM); the anti-Don the Con women’s marches in 2016 and afterwards; March for Our Lives; Bernie Sanders’ Democratic-Socialist presidential campaign, and the ongoing energization of the progressive left both inside and outside the Democratic Party. Another key aspect of Occupy Wall Street was its nonhierarchical and non-exclusive character; this led to its failure in the short term, but its ongoing influence in the longer term.
One additional effect of Occupy Wall Street was its fusion of in-person protest and use of social media, which has gotten even more sophisticated today. Almost every subsequent movement, including MAGA, has learned useful lessons about how a 59-day protest was able to amplify itself to a global audience.
On a related note, supporting a free Palestine and a two-state solution, and condemning violent Zionism are quite distinct from “supporting Hamas.” If you can’t see the difference you are part of the problem.
FreddieW
Bernie Sanders certainly accomplished a lot. Human Rights Campaign wouldn’t even get behind him, choosing instead to be the Hillary Rodham Clinton campaign. That was what prompted me to drop my membership. I’ve never renewed.