It’s no secret that Chris Pine is showing wood. The actor’s full-frontal scene in the upcoming Netflix film Outlaw King already has tongues wagging, and you can add three famous names to the list of interested parties: Rami Malec, Sally Field and Graham Norton.
Norton broached the subject on his show, noting the moment is getting “a lot of attention.”
“Well, yeah,” chimed in an unsurprised Field, who was sharing the couch with Pine and Malec.
Related: Chris Pine says his full-frontal attention is “pretty cool”
Malec, who has been getting a lot of attention himself for his Freddie Mercury transformation in the upcoming Bohemian Rhapsody, asked for some clarification:
“Is the full monty the front or the back?”
“It’s kind of the whole shebang, man,” said Pine.
“It’s both. If you don’t like one, you can try the other,” replied Norton. “It’s all in here.”
“Different strokes for different folks, as it were,” replied Pine, ever the good sport.
Watch:
And if you need more intel, here’s Pine telling ET it’s “pretty cool” that his, ahem, lumber is the breakout star of the film:
Here’s the trailer for Outlaw King, available to stream on Netflix November 9:
Josh447
Yeah yeah, a bit late.
Johndoes
I hope you guys don’t actually think it’s real.
Adam DeVine had to “fight” Netflix so that he could get to use his real one and not a prothetic.
Young Timer
Chris, Chris, Chris….
If you’ve seen one…. you’ve seen ’em all.
batesmotel
It’s just a penis. Half the planet has one and has had one for thousands of years.
JamJewel
The comments are not surprising for a magazine catering to the gay male community. But it’s a real issue in terms of male sexuality in film which has long been governed by men who see nothing wrong in female genitalia but scoff at men’s. That’s why women think it’s a big deal and ABOUT DAMN TIME!
broadshoulder
Oh piss off
OzJosh
This is actually bullshit. You may see a lot of female tits and ass, but you will almost never see female genitalia. That is every bit as rare – probably more rare these days – than seeing male genitalia. And men are baring their chests and butts on screen every bit as much as women these days. The argument that there’s some kind gender inequity around nudity has been a crock for decades. The truth is movie producers know bare flesh will get attention and help promote their film – very reliably on dim-witted shows like Graham Norton’s, where the latest nude scene or wardrobe malfunction is the topic of literally every second interview.
Dansktex
OzJosh, you must limit your viewing to only super popular American films. There are plenty of independent films and especially foreign films with female genitalia on view ( but hindered on most by their pubic hair). Try films from Europe, Latin America, Israel, etc., unless, since you are reading this website, you have no interest in seeing full frontal views of nude women.
Music908
It’s a pretty accurate prosthetic, if it actually is prosthetic. I mean Chris is more than just a sex symbol. He’s really a FINE actor. Let’s cheer on the manhood..
I’m all for more of it…
rodzilla
i saw him the other nite on COLBERT or CORDEN. granted he is a very attractive guy and his intelligence & demeanor just makes him even more attractive.
broadshoulder
Outlaw King looks complete shit. I am on King Edwards I side
Birdbrain1963
So where is the pick?
Virpilosus
I saw the film, and it’s a well done historical movie. The very brief nude scenes are well done, simple as that, make sense in the film’s context, and are not prurient. Story over…