
Welcome back to our queer film retrospective, “A Gay Old Time.” In this week’s column, we revisit Staircase, and early gay comedy that hasn’t aged well—and was spoiled to begin with.
Director Stanley Donen is undoubtedly one of the most influential filmmakers to come out of the Golden Age of Hollywood. Although his name may not be the most recognizable one right away, his filmography includes an impressive number of all-time classics—it is almost unbelievable that a single man could conceive all of them, at least partially.
Just having helmed Singin’ in the Rain should be enough for any filmmaker to call it a day, but Donen also had on his resume the musical adaptations of On The Town (which, like Singin’, was also co-directed with Gene Kelly) and Seven Brides For Seven Brothers, the collaborations with then-choreographer Bob Fosse The Pajama Game and Damn Yankees!, and the classic Audrey Hepburn vehicles Charade and Funny Face, to name just a handful. His resume is the stuff of dreams.
However, with almost three dozen films under his belt, not all of them were bound to become timeless classics. Many have fallen through the cracks of time. Some are worth revisiting (for example, the road trip romance Two For The Road, or the musical It’s Always Fair Weather). And others… well, others maybe are better hidden inside those cracks.
His 1969 film Staircase belongs in that latter category.
The Set-Up
This “comedy” (using that term in the broadest and most generous sense, with thick quotation marks around it) stars bonafide movie stars Rex Harrison and Richard Burton as Charlie and Harry, two gay barbers that have lived together for almost thirty years, and whose lives get upended by the arrival of a daughter, a mother that moves in, and a looming court date after one of them is caught having done drag.
The film is one hundred minutes of two of the most acclaimed actors of their generation prancing around in effeminate mannerisms, shouting quippy and mean-spirited remarks at each other in an attempt to…? Create a portrait of what straight people thought gay partnered life was like at the time? Barely humanize two characters that nevertheless come off as only monstrous towards each other? Make people grateful they are not them?
That question, the purpose of this movie to exist, remains a mystery throughout. Yes, it is one of the very few examples of a mainstream, studio-backed Hollywood film of its time that starred two men in a domestic partnership. Yes, it had some of the biggest talents behind and in front of the camera.
It is, in a way, a minor touchstone of queer representation. But maybe it is a touchstone that has mostly gotten lost in time for a reason.
Bitter Old Queens

Charlie and Harry, although in a long-lasting marriage for all intents and purposes, are nothing but mean, hateful, and resentful of each other. They run a barber shop together, and clearly have built a routine (and one must assume some sort of affection) over time.
But watching the film, it’s perplexing to imagine how two people that clearly despise each other so much could have ever been in love. And it’s not a commentary on the loss of love over time, either. These two men are reduced to the age-old stereotype of the bitter queens—generators of clever one-liners with no humanity behind them.
Queer And Loathing

The barely-threaded plot of the movie sees Charlie learning that his daughter from a past marriage—who he barely knows—is coming to visit. Harry’s convalescent mother has moved in with them. And Charlie has gotten a court citation because it’s been found out that he performed in a drag act years ago, which sends him into a spiral of self-loathing so deep that The Velvet Rage would devote an entire chapter to it.
Watching this film brought to mind another landmark queer movie that would come out just a year after, William Friedkin’s The Boys In The Band. While that movie also depicts mean homosexuals dealing with self-loathing, shouting quips at each other, and dealing with society’s prejudices, there is a guttural truth to that text that still resonates today. The pain and humanity of those characters are at the core, while Staircase seems to roughly sketch what gays are supposed to act like from afar.
Relationship Troubles

But the most confounding thing about Staircase is how it fits inside Stanley Donen’s filmography. Donen (who co-wrote a lot of the projects he directed, including this one) was particularly good at creating characters with fleshed-out, complicated relationships—particularly partners (romantic or otherwise).
There was Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn dangerous magnetism in Charade; Audrey Hepburn and Fred Astaire’s alluring chemistry in Funny Face; Audrey Hepburn (once again!) and Albert Finney longing for their lost marriage in Two For The Road; Gene Kelly and Donald O’Connor’s friendship in Singin’ In The Rain, or the camaraderie between the soldiers in On The Town and It’s Always Fair Weather.
His best movies are anchored by character dynamics: their history, emotional baggage, and little quirks that they share and discover.
All these are missing in Staircase.
A Sad Gay Story

One would think that someone that seemed to understand human relationships as strongly as Donen did in his other movies would have been able to make Charlie and Harry’s relationship nuanced, even as a comedy. But it’s just not there. Even as a reflection of the times, and steeped in stereotypes, this is a particularly short-minded depiction of gay men.
Staircase is a cinematic curiosity, and not in a good way. It is a bump in both the filmography of one of the most influential directors in Hollywood history, and in the canon of queer cinema, where its depiction of same-sex “love” as a doomed partnership filled with bitterness and resentment is one that we are still trying to rid ourselves of.
Staircase is not officially steaming online, but it may be found on YouTube and physical copies can be purchased through Amazon Prime.
Related:
Let’s revisit ‘The Gay Deceivers,’ the ’60s comedy where straight guys play gay to avoid the draft
Two straights move in together and pretend to be a couple in 1969—what could go wrong?
Man About Town
Yo, Jorge: the characters in “On the Town” are sailors, not soldiers.
Kangol2
Three sailors to be exact, played in the 1949 film version by Gene Kelly, Frank Sinatra, and Jules Munshin!
“New York, New York,
a wonderful town,
the Bronx is up gut the Battery’s down,
people ride around in a hole in the ground,
New York, New York,
it’s a wonderful town!”
abfab
Is it Fleet Week again?
abfab
Happy Memorial Day, all, and go to hell Geraldo Rivera……….whore.
MSN
Geraldo Rivera tried to do a kind deed for U.S. Marines in New York City for Fleet Week, but learned he wasn’t the only one who wanted to show gratitude to the U.S. service members.
“Fleet Week in NY,” Geraldo texted. “Ran into group of US Marines having dinner at famed Smith & Wollensky steak house. I told waiter I’d like to pick up their check. Waiter told me there were 2 other offers ahead of me. Bless our service folk & Remember our fallen warriors.”
FreddieW
Haven’t heard of this movie, but I may try to watch it. Sounds like “Vicious”, which I really like.
I do not understand saying that “Boys in the Band” has current value. It’s a relic. I watched it because of the place it was given in “The Celluloid Closet”, but I didn’t like it. It was somewhat more tolerable than the all-time worst that makes me ill whenever I watch just 5 minutes of it — “Tea and Sympathy”.
Jim
Not as good as “Vicious” and really a different animal.
The movie does reflect Britain at the time
Doug
This film doesn’t have the wit that “Vicious” did. It’s just depressing and an excuse for straight people to laugh at gay men who are portrayed as bitchy losers.
Pietro D
Just saw the film not more than a year ago and I have to say it is one of the worst films I have ever seen. I have no idea how or why Harrison and Burton agreed to do it – I suppose they wanted or needed the money. It’s trash! And it does a disservice to the gay community!
paul dorian lord fredine
as much as people want to sat it’s a bad film, wonder why such noted actors took the roles and say it presents stereotypical types, all may be true, but in my 54 out years i have to say i’ve personally witnessed such relationships, even some among my closest and dearest friends. some people love in very different ways and even if we ask why we should never judge. if this works for them, it’s none of our business. same goes for open relationships and ‘throples’.
LeBlevsez
I’ve never understood the raves about Richard Burton. The only time he wasn’t chewing the scenery is when he was too busy chomping.
Kangol2
He’s outstanding in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf, where Elizabeth Taylor takes acting to a whole new level, and he has one of the great declaiming voices out there. He’s better in plays and filmed version of Shakespeare, but he also is exceptional in Look Back in Anger.
Diplomat
He deep sixed it in Cleopatra. He definitely has one of the most injective voices. He used to go out into the hills and throw his voice across canyons to perfect his projection for acting. It worked. I find his acting to be amazing.
inbama
Just watched it.
Are they really all that different from Sam Waterston and Martin Sheen in “Grace and Frankie?”
Kangol2
This film was a total misfire by Stanley Donen. He had many triumphs, including all the ones you named, but he began to motor off the track with this one and several of his late-career films (like The Little Prince, Movie, Movie and Saturn 3, one of the worst SF films of the last 50 years. BTW, does anyone else remember Blame It On Rio, which has to be one of the worst, cringiest films ever? It was another Donen late-career bomb.
Ronbo
No bitter old queens here…. riiiight.
Just read the bitter commentary and bitter comments and one might recognize the truths throughout the film. I would not recommend the film but then I wouldn’t recommend the author or the commenters either. When you demand that your art kowtow to your opinions, it’s ceases to be art and only becomes propaganda. This satisfies neither extreme.
abfab
Fascinating that you would return and chime in again with the mere mention of ”bitter old queens”.
Ronbo
Speak of the devil! Kismet is the convergence of discovery, truth and awe. Truth revealed!
Jim
This movie is definitely worth watching if for no other reason as a reflection of what things were like in Britain at the time.
Sorry if it’s not the story or movie you’d like but it does have truth which one may be uncomfortable with.
abfab
George Maharis, TV Heartthrob of ‘Route 66,’ Is Dead at 94 NYT
(I had to put this somewhere—doubting they’d cover it)
Herrbert B. Leonard, the show’s executive producer, “thought he’d hired a young hunk for the show, a hip, sexy man and good actor that all the girls would go for,” Ms. Blocher wrote. “This was all true of Maharis, but not the whole story, as Leonard discovered to his anger and dismay. George was gay, it turned out.”
Ms. Blocher attributed Mr. Maharis’s departure to a number of factors. “The producers felt betrayed and duped when they learned of Maharis’s sexual orientation, and never trusted him again,” she wrote, adding, “Maharis, for his part, started to feel that he was carrying the show and going unappreciated.”
He did not discuss his sexuality in interviews, but he proudly described being the July 1973 nude centerfold in Playgirl magazine to Esquire in 2017.
“A lot of guys came up to me,” he said, “and asked me to sign it for their ‘wives.’”
frapachino
Lets burn everyone involved or anyone who has ever watched it or talked about or referred to it in any way shape or form! There happy radicals?
Kangol2
You’re sounding unhinged again. Call a psychiatrist!
mildredspierce
Watch Dirk Bogarde in “Victim”. Surprisingly good.
Herman75
Wow!
Even Roger Ebert found nothing good about it. I like old-timey movies but the last word in his review was “hideous” so I’m not feeling at all encouraged to look for it.
inbama
As it had a respectable run in London in ’66 starring Paul Scofield (A Man For All Seasons) and Patrick McGee and on Broadway starring BAFTA, Emmy and Tony Award winner Eli Wallach and Lio O’Shea (whose performance got him a Tony nomination), Donan had every reason to believe this was a serious play with something to say.
Living in a time when most of the information about homosexuality was false, suicide and a lack of self-knowledge were real issues – especially for unsophisticated gay men like Charles and Harry.
Some Wiki trivia: Staircase’s playwright named his character Charles Dyer after himself, and Harry C. Leeds is an anagram of his name.
Wheelerman
Staircase is a part of the “hagsploitation” movies of the 1960’s that began with Whatever Happened To Baby Jane; where old stars do horror movies. Although not produced as such ; Staircase is an unintentional hagsploitation movie. Most have camp value; this has no value. Do not waste your time. TCM had the nerve to show it during PRIDE Month last year.
LAN8
It’s hard to fathom but a substantial number of queer people were indeed nasty to each other back then. There was even a form of talking to other gay men in a “bitchy queen” sort of way. If you see plays like “Boys in the Band” or read books like “Giovanni’s Room” you’ll note the undertones of bitchy queer life back in the day. I suspect at least part of this was because you had to hide being gay (you could lose your job or be run out of town or even be killed – I had older friends experience each one of those scenarios or that had a lover experience them) and the secrecy and lies probably took their toll on domestic life. There was an underlying bitterness in knowing you were not accepted in “normal” life. While there are still tons of problems, especially for trans people, things are overall much better than they were even if we compare it to say the 80’s, let alone the 50’s or 60’s. Many younger gays have a hard time imagining it because they haven’t had to experience it, which is a good thing. Even famous people like the comedian Paul Lynde who was about as “publicly” out as you could be in the 70’s were very bitter in private life.
It’s quite sad really that older gays (and it was especially gay white men back then) had to endure this. England was very bad about gay men, from the chemical castration of Alan Touring (the father of the modern computer) to the Margaret Campbell/Duchess of Argyll affair, which ruined a woman but really involved several gay men, one of whom I knew many years ago.
inbama
Actually, it was more about wit than bitterness. Social events had a “can you top this” aspect to the conversation.
Frankly, self-deprecating humor was a lot more enjoyable than having to listen to today’s humorless narcissists reciting their boring ideological drivel and demanding respect for their pronoun choices.
dbmcvey
It wasn’t as bad as having to endure inbama’s constant grinding on his old saws.
abfab
imbana is in panic mode. His boyfriend Chriss Cristie is announcing he’s pregnant again.
dbmcvey
This movie is one of the best arguments for gay people making gay movies.