When looking at photos from MLB Spring Training, parental discretion is advised.
Earlier this week, we covered the controversy over MLB’s new player uniforms. Nike, the league’s official uniform provider, decided to change the model this year. The sports apparel giant says the new threads are more breathable.
But they’re also…see-through.
How about we take this to the next level?
Subscribe to our newsletter for a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
Yup! Batter Cover up!
As you can see, players’ underwear is now fully visible, but the problem goes beyond seeing tucked in jerseys and compression shorts.
Fans can now catch a glimpse of what their favorite ballplayers are packing. It looks like San Francisco Giants infielder Casey Schmitt, for example, is going to start every at-bat this season with a two-ball advantage.
The Nike-generated, Fanatics-produced uniforms debuted at last year’s All-Star Game. They’re supposed to be lighter, but they also look a lot cheaper.
Enlarged, stitched player names are out, and small letters are in. While authentic MLB jerseys retail for hundreds of dollars, the new designs look like they were found in the bargain bin.
Complaints are so universal, the Fanatics’ customer service team is already making amends with displeased players and customers.
It appears that Seattle Mariners infielder Michael Chavis is eligible for a refund, if he so chooses.
While the amateur-looking tops are bad enough, the real crisis is down below. The head of the MLB Players’ Association, Tony Clark, says players feel naked.
“A lot of the rhetoric is confirmation that the pants are see-through. It’s been an ongoing conversation where each day has yielded something new that doesn’t seem to make as much sense as you would like it,” he told reporters, via ESPN.
“Universal concern is the pant,” he added.
As Los Angeles Angels reliever Carlos Estévez put it: “When I wear my pants, I feel like I’m wearing someone else’s pants.”
Such as…a gay adult film star’s? Spring Training is meant for players to prepare for the upcoming season. But this poor San Diego Padres player looks like he’s ready for a starring role in a Corbin Fisher film.
Flexibility, as always, will be key.
In a statement released Thursday, Nike failed to address the issue at hand.
“We always put the athlete at the center of everything we do. We worked closely with MLB players, teams and the league to create the most advanced uniforms in the history of MLB which are lighter and more flexible,” the company said.
“The quality and the performance of our product is of the utmost importance to us. We will continue to work with MLB, the players and our manufacturing partner to address player uniforms.”
Related:
MLB players are outraged about their new see-through pants
The new team uniforms don’t leave a lot to the imagination.
Nike’s response is so tone deaf, it’s fair to wonder whether there is another motive at play. After years of declining fan interest, perhaps MLB is looking to reach new demos.
Gay baseball fans, for one, aren’t complaining about the skimpy look. Does Derek Jeter want to try on his teammate’s gold thong again?
That’ll put our butts in the seats.
This is a renaissance for gay baseball fans
— Emcee (@mrpolicywonk) February 22, 2024
With the regular season still roughly six weeks away, Nike and Fanatics have plenty of time to adjust their new models. But one thing is for certain: we’ve never been more ready for a new season to begin!
Play ball… literally!
Fahd
Prurient yucks aside, don’t they have players’ representatives working with the design teams? When you have a quality control problem/manufacturing disaster, you don’t respond the way Nike has done.
This preposterous design/manufacturing blunder already is a Harvard Business School case study. Better hurry up and fix things. Just sew up a batch with last year’s fabrics if nothing else. I’ll be interested to know who winds up getting fired.
CatholicXXX
what are people seeing that I am not? They look like normal pics.
abfab
Ted Cruz is ordering all the backstock. (Did you see his latest haircut?)
Covid Hermit
Fanatics (the manufacturer) is well known for their lack of quality; they are the definition of fast fashion. Which is why I refuse to pay for any of their products. It’s hard, but you can find other team branded apparel that is of somewhat better quality made by other manufacturers.
I expect the NHL to have the same problems next year, when Fanatics begins manufacturing their on-ice jerseys. But, considering the PR problems the NHL has had lately, maybe that’s a match made in heaven?
Kangol2
Kind of telling that none of these photos show a darker-skinned player and/or one with a sizable package, because in both cases these pants will much more revealing–and probably cause much more of an uproar among a sizable portion of fans, while proving to be a delight to others.
I do think the monopolization and centralization of the outfits, while the typical US move, is a bad idea, and that each team should be able to source its clothing to manufacturers it chooses, especially local, domestic ones. MLB can set standards, as it did in the past, but also allow the money to be spread around more widely, as it also did in the past. Debacles like this would be far less common.
dgsea06
Yeah, right. Much ado about nothing…
smittoons
Not really interested to know which Casey Schmitt photo was retouched, but this is amusing, at least.
Mack
If nothing else, wait until it rains, they’ll be showing everything. I do miss the baseball uniform of old with the tight pants.
Mr.Gavin Elster
Boo-hoo! Another first-world problem. I don’t know about the other MLB players, but, new Dodger Shohei Ohtani can probably spend some of his obscene $700 MILLION salary on new duds.
abfab
Ken Cammenetti…..RIP