Get ready for the stupidest things you’ll hear all day…
The Republican Party is officially backing Kari Lake in Arizona’s highly competitive U.S. Senate race this year.
After months of running a charm offensive to mixed results, Lake impressed party officials and donors at the National Republican Senate Committee’s winter meeting at The Breakers luxury resort in Palm Beach, Florida.
Politics, but make it gay!
Stay woke with our briefing while staying informed on all things LGBTQ+ entertainment, life, and more!
Politico reports Lake, despite her antagonistic history, stressed her apparent desire to unify the party and reach out to those whom she’s alienated. The NRSC endorsed her on Tuesday, gifting the gubernatorial loser party resources in her latest political quest.
“Kari Lake is one of the most talented candidates in the country,” said Montana Sen. and NRSC head Steve Daines.
That’s a description that some Arizona Republicans may disagree with. For months, Lake has struggled to mend relationships she napalmed as a conspiracy-obsessed gubernatorial candidate in 2022.
One GOP official told the Arizona Republic Lake’s “charm offensive has turned out to be offensive with no charm.”
Former U.S. Rep. Matt Salmon, whom Lake accused of being “OK with special needs kids being raped” after he opposed her plan to install cameras in school bathrooms, told The Washington Post he would never help her.
“She employs the politics of personal destruction, and she’ll say anything — the most vile things in the world — to get ahead. And I’m sorry, I just can’t forget that,” he said.
Related:
A photo of Ted Cruz in tight pants goes viral for all the wrong reasons
Another photo of Ted Cruz and Donald Trump at Mar-A-Lago also prompted mockery online.
Just last month, Lake seemingly blackmailed former Arizona GOP chairman Jeff DeWit into resigning from his post. A 10-minute recording of a conversation between Lake and DeWit, in which he tries to convince her to drop out, mysteriously leaked.
DeWit told Lake there are “very powerful people” opposed to her, and asked whether she would consider accepting payment to withdraw. He says Lake told him another “damaging tape” would leak if he stayed in his role.
“I received an ultimatum from Lake’s team: resign today or face the release of a new, more damaging recording,” he said in a statement, per the New York Times.
But at the NRSC retreat, Lake apparently assuaged concerns about her combative and conniving ways. She’s credited with hiring professional consultants, and downplaying election conspiracies (Lake lost the gubernatorial race to Democrat Katie Hobbs by more than 17,000 votes, and still hasn’t conceded).
However, Lake may be avoiding election conspiracies out of legal necessity.
Much like her idol Donald Trump, legal issues are piling up for the MAGA anti-drag queen. She’s being sued for defamation by one of Maricopa County’s top elections officials, after she falsely accused him of tampering with the 2022 gubernatorial election results.
Lake has lost every court case related to the 2022 election, and the State Bar of Arizona is proceeding with cases against her attorneys.
Senate Democrats, for one, say they’re pleased to see their Republican colleagues rally around the former newscaster.
“We’re thrilled by the NRSC’s choice to endorse Kari Lake. She’s an election loser despised by Arizona Republicans, and brings massive baggage and disqualifying flaws to the campaign,” the DSCC posted on social media.
“Lake is the perfect candidate – to lose the race.”
While Lake says she’s interested in unifying Republicans, she’s definitely not looking to unify the country. She attended the Super Bowl Sunday in Las Vegas, and took her culture wars right to Allegiant Stadium.
“The Star-Spangled Banner” and “Black National Anthem” were performed before the big game. Can you guess which song Lake ripped on social media?
The obvious answer is… correct!
The last time Republicans supported Lake, it ended disastrously. Even though the Republican Governors Association funneled millions of dollars to her losing campaign, she still attacked outgoing Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey and walked out of a RGA conference to attend an event hosted by pillow magnet/conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell.
In a sign that Lake isn’t actually looking to moderate, she’s hired a Christian nationalist as campaign chair. Floyd Brown is a far-right operative who wants Christians to take over America, and the proprietor of racist attack ads.
One of his groups, for example, released an attack ad on Barack Obama falsely claiming he was registered as a Muslim student in Indonesia.
Once a reliable red state, Arizona is now purple, with a Democratic governor and one Democratic senator (Kyrsten Sinema switched her registration to “Independent” last year.) The 2024 senate race promises to be one of the most competitive in the country.
The likely Democratic nominee, Rep. Ruben Gallego, is out-fundraising Lake. Sinema’s entrance into the race could complicate matters as well.
Politico reports Senate Republicans view Lake’s nomination as inevitable, which might be the real reason why they’re rallying around her now: they’re out of options.
But hey, Republicans have nothing to worry about. Lake is a changed woman.
She’s now cool, calm and collected. You know, a real unifier!
Err… never mind!
Related:
If you thought Kari Lake was bad, meet her psychotic campaign chair who wants Christians to “control America”
The Arizona gubernatorial loser has aligned herself with the creator of one of the most racist political ads in modern U.S. political history.
dbmcvey
Republicans just love these kooks.
Baron Wiseman
Said the one who believes men can chest feed.
decrans
Touche, Baron Wiseman.
Bosch
Hypothyroidism, stress and starvation, a pituitary tumor, certain liver problems, some medications, and feminizing hormone therapy can potentially induce lactation in men.
Be more specific with your transphobia.
ShaverC
Bosch, You just listed a bunch of medical anomalies. Men can’t breastfeed.
still_onthemark
Relax, Baron, we all saw Robert DeNiro do it in the Fockers movies.
still_onthemark
@Bosch: That kind of “lactation” would not be any help to a hungry baby.
Bosch
“Said the one who believes men can chest feed.”
“Men can’t breastfeed.”
I understand the difference between respecting the gender identity of a transmasc individual, and inventing nonsense arguments about the biology of the sexes. Why don’t you?
Bosch
@still_onthemark Their complaint wasn’t really about science. Their complaint was actually “Said the one who respects the gender identity of transmasc individuals.” But since empathy on its own isn’t insulting enough, the troll had to dress it up with a bit of dumbass.
ShaverC
Bosch, It’s 100% about science.
Bosch
Shaver, no it’s not. It’s 100% about shaming people for accepting trans folk.
ShaverC
Bosch, Does a trans man go to a urologist?
Bosch
Hahahahaha that’s your “gotcha” question? You’re not aware that both sexes have a urinary tract?
ShaverC
A trans man would go to a gynecologist.
Bosch
Oh my god shaver, no. You don’t go to a gynecologist for urinary issues.
dbmcvey
Oh, look! Barren and decraps bonding over their homophobia!
dbmcvey
And Shaver too! I triggered all the conservatives!
ShaverC
Bosch, You’re right, I’m wrong there. What I should’ve said is that a trans man still needs to see a gynecologist, whereas men do not go to gynecologists. It’s not transphobic to say a trans person has a right to live their life, absolutely, but I’m not pretending they’re a real man or woman.
Bosch
“whereas men do not go to gynecologists”
Hey shaver. Transwomen also need to go to the gynecologist. How kind of you to respect their identities as women.
ShaverC
Bosch, Well how about this: What would be the result if a DNA test was done on a trans female?
ZzBomb
I sincerely tried avoiding this chain b/c it’s completely irrelevant to the article but in light of Shaver trying to drag science into their transphobia I had to step in.
Shaver, a simple genetic test does not and cannot tell you what the gender of a person. Mostly b/c chromosomes don’t determine gender definitely. There’s even a condition known as Klinefelter where a person could express XYY or YXX chromosomes and you wouldn’t know the difference. Using science as a way to justify your bigotry is an old and tired tradition. People did similar things to black people, jewish people, and others b/c they cherry pick which part of the science they want to use to further their hateful narrative.
In the end, treat human beings as human beings. Understanding is not a prerequisite for respecting others. This is fundamental thing kids are taught early on and how to be nice to other people. It’s sad your parents failed to teach you such a necessary skill to associate in civilized society.
dbmcvey
Barren is such an idiot!
The only people (allegedly) I’ve ever heard use the term “chest feed” are the conservative trolls on this site.
ShaverC
dbmcvey, New York State Department of Health, The Well Project (women’s health non profit), National Institute of Health, UC San Francisco, Emery Healthcare, Jamaica Hospital Medical Centre, U Chicago Medicine. They all use “chestfeeding” as do many others. So not just conservative panic.
ZzBomb
“…. all use chest feed!”
Citation Needed
abfab
Zz you are wonderful and smart. High marks for having the patience to write the way you do and for being on the better side of Humanity.
ShaverC
ZZ, You can easily google that. Or is research something you don’t know how to do?
ZzBomb
Well for starters, the onus of proof always rests on the person making the claim. That person being you.
And 2, no where on any OBGYN health care sight have I ever seen internal policy documentation publicly provided over the terminology of individual care. (B/c yes, Google is very much my friend)
So, your move.
ShaverC
ZZ, You’re super smart. My proof is that you can go to any of the institutions I listed and see what they write. If you don’t know how to do that, then I’m sorry you never graduated high school but maybe it’s time to get that GED.
Since you’re so big on proof, prove this statement you just made:
“And 2, no where on any OBGYN health care sight have I ever seen internal policy documentation publicly provided over the terminology of individual care.”
How many sites did you visit? Which ones were they? What do you mean by “internal policy documentation publicly provided over the terminology of individual care”? That is just a jumble of words.
ZzBomb
Shaver, I’m not playing that game. You made the claim, you need to back it up. This on you to prove, not the other way around.
What’s the matter? Not able to do research?
ZzBomb
Shaver,
“What do you mean “internal policy documentation publicly provided over the terminology of individual care”?”
Dude, it’s plain English. If you’re asking what this means, you shouldn’t be questioning other people’s education level.
dbmcvey
Again, Shaver. The only people I have ever heard using this term are right wing anti-trans trolls like you on this site.
If an organization uses that term it might be because they serve a specific clientelle, and don’t care that they’re triggering snowflakes like yourself.
ShaverC
I literally gave you a list of US health institutions that use “chestfeeding”. That is the proof. If you can’t understand that then I don’t know how else to put it.
ZZ, No what you wrote makes no sense.
dbmcvey, Can you explain what ZZ meant by “no where on any OBGYN health care sight have I ever seen internal policy documentation publicly provided over the terminology of individual care.”?
ZzBomb
Shaver,
Literally none of them list that as terminology they use in their individual standard of care. This is not some lingo I made up. And if you literally are unable to make out what that means, then your level of vocabulary is as abhorrent as your ability to debate.
You clearly never had to write a research paper, b/c just randomly listing off names without actually showing where it is so is not what qualifies as “proof.” Just like saying an election is rigged w/o providing evidence is not “proof” either. See how that works?
And with that, I got better things to do than help teach a knuckle dragging right wing troll with a questionable education level how to sound words out based on the spelling. I do that enough w/ my nephew and niece.
dbmcvey
Jokes on you Shaves, this is because of conservative Christians who are offended by the word “breast.”
ShaverC
dbmcvey, You two really don’t know how to read? Conservatives want to keep “breastfeeding”. Wow. Do you read every second word or just assume what someone is writing?
dbmcvey
Shaver, you, Barren and decraps are the only ones who ever bring up chest feeding. It seems like it’s a “you” problem.
Mack
Baron Wiseass, as usual you made one out of yourself. I don’t recall ANY male stating they can breastfeed. I guess it on some dumbass right wing site that you watch or listen to and stupidly believe. Your people seems to believe the stupidest things in the world. How is that Flat earth working out for you?
Baron Wiseman
ShaverC is correct.
It took me less than one minute to find that the first organization ShaverC listed has used “chest feeding.”
“New York State Department of Health Awards $8.9 Million to Promote Breast/Chest Feeding in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Communities”
“Breastfeeding, Chestfeeding, and Lactation Friendly New York Aims to Improve Health and Reduce the Risk of Chronic Disease for Women and Infants”
I’m certain you will all apologize to ShaverC to acknowledge he was correct.
Baron Wiseman
Same for the second organization ShaverC listed – The Well Project.
Article posted January 25, 2024:
“Breastfeeding, Chestfeeding and HIV: Supporting Informed Choices”
Baron Wiseman
@Mack
” I guess it on some dumbass right wing site that you watch or listen to and stupidly believe. Your people seems to believe the stupidest things in the world.”
Sorry pumpkin, you just embarrassed yourself. “Your people seems to believe the stupidest things in the world.” Mack, perhaps you should get some real news sources and educate yourself on what the progressive left is doing to our country and “respected” medical institutions.
JaredNorthcutt30
There have only been a handful of studies on the efficacy and effectiveness of these pharmacological interventions on infants, some of which have shown irregular heartbeats.
JaredNorthcutt30
The simplest thing DNA can tell you is whether someone is male or female. Apart from some very rare cases, that don’t even involve looking at their DNA sequence – all you need to know is whether they have X and Y chromosomes (making them male) or a pair of Xs (which makes them female). ZZbomb’s diversion is a way of negating science for the vast majority of people. And in the cases that Shaver brings up, the DNA test would show whether someone was born male or female. It’s embedded in the DNA. More whataboutisms about ZZbomb. He loves peddling his whataboutisms.
JaredNorthcutt30
This is decrans, by the way. My laptop is acting up. JaredNorthcutt is my old handle from the aughts. Unlike Dickvaney and the neoliberal gang of idiots, I don’t have sock puppet accounts and I own my handles. Thank you very much before the usual hysterics begin from the usual trolls.
abfab
Imagine how fuc king sick these so called gay men must be with thier focus on breasts. Seek counseling Northtrans.
decrans
Nope. Again, I’m more concerned with long term effects of pumping infants (who cannot consent) with untested do-it-yourself drug regimens. And Little Trumpy McAbs, you clearly need help with your gross and creepy vagina obsession. Most people here not associated with your sock puppet accounts would agree.
Baron Wiseman
@dbmcvey
@ZzBomb
I really loved your apologies to ShaverC for your errors. Really heartfelt and sincere.
Den
The most interesting thing about this drawn out and off-topic thread is how it highlights the difficulty far right wingers have in expressing any respect for or admitting the humanity of those they feel are lesser humans than they. Had Shaver or Baron been writing in an earlier time they’d be advocating for castration, electroshock therapy or lobotomy in homosexuals. Or if they were trying to be “humane”, imprisonment.
The article is about Lake, definitely a grifter and kook, secondarily it mentions Sinema, also a kook. Both are media whores as well. But the far right wingers have to make it about trashing things they cannot even try to wrap their self-centered little minds around because it might reveal shades of grey in their rigidly black and white world. And yes, they love their kooks; the meaner, stupider and more obviously self serving they are, the more they love them.
decrans
Oh dumbass Den. What do you say to the lesbian girl featured in the NYT de-transitioner article/OP-ED? She hacked her tits off over internalized homophobia. And what did YOUR side say? You go, Mr. Thang! Live your truth, honeychild. Idiot.
m
Praying for all the sky daddies past, present and future to not let this cvunt win anything for the rest of her lying life. Bonus if ya can just take her away from this planet or galaxy.
ZzBomb
One thing also against Lake, this article didn’t mention, is that she’s almost broke with virtually no war chest to speak of. So considering the RNC is in the same financial shape, 2024 isn’t looking good for conservatives.
Losing George Santos’ seat in a district Trump won last night is certainly a portend.
Lot’s to smile over today folks. But more work and voting needs to be done!
Vote Blue!
abfab
And let’s keep our hearts red and warm and loved.
Happy Valentine’s Day! xo
dbmcvey
I’m sure Barren will be there to feed her chest.
ZzBomb
@DB
Their insults are as hollow as the space between their ears.
JaredNorthcutt30
And yet, your forecasting doesn’t include a presidential race featuring various political opponents from all sides of the spectrum (far-left, center, and left-conservative) and a deeply unpopular president. America doesn’t like Trump or Trump candidates. No surprise. They don’t like Biden either. The main difference ZZbomb omits is this: The above-mentioned cavalcade of candidates coming at Biden from all sides. That tips the scales.
JaredNorthcutt30
It was in a district that in 2020, per Ballotpedia, Biden carried by over 10 points. Tom Suozzi, who represented the district from 2017 to 2023, was the virtual incumbent in the race. He won the district in 2018 by 59-41 percent, and in 2020 by 56-43. The Republican was also a registered Democrat until recently. Per usual, ZZbomb has opened his bag of deflections.
abfab
And you opened your mouth which is one big hot gas bag of bullshit. We don’t need your political views or your crazy percentages. Get lost.
decrans
I’m here for the long haul, Little Trumpy McAbs. Deal, you hysterical little misogynistic loon.
Bosch
All these trolls coming here to complain about trans people again… Guys, it’s just a manly haircut! Lake is not a transwoman!
ZzBomb
It’s a losing strategy. Fighting fictitious culture wars is a losing strategy. Denigrating others to make yourself look better is a losing strategy. But most importantly, hitching your wagon to guy facing 91 indictments, who trashes on America, constantly claiming our country is not great is a losing strategy.
still_onthemark
Lol. But she has a deep voice, isn’t that suspicious?
Fahd
She’s just offensive, no charm. She’s the perfect candidate to lose the race. Enough said. I’ll be happy to see corrupt Sinema go when Senator-elect Gallego takes office in January 2025.
abfab
The troll-bot’s batteries are running low and will soon be useless and dead. They just get dumber and dumber and dumber. And so repetitive. Non-stop bullshit and Fox News talking points. Trolls must be like those creeps who hang around with people even when they know they are not wanted. Pointless twits.
JaredNorthcutt30
Much like your misogyny-rooted brain cell. Try re-booting with ‘Bedknobs and Broomsticks’ lyrics. This time, it might make you look halfway sane.
abfab
Dear, sweet Jared,
No.