Rapper Blueface under fire for asking 6-year-old son if he’s gay on video
By David Hudson · 42 comments· Updated on January 26, 2024
Blueface (Photo: Shutterstock)
Rapper Blueface has faced condemnation online for posting a video to his Instagram stories in which he quizzes his six-year-old son, asking him if he’s gay.
In a series of videos posted yesterday, Blueface, aka Johnathan Jamall Porter, 27, shows female dancers at his home. He then goes to find his young son, Javaughn, who is in a food pantry searching for chips.
“It’s booty cheeks out here and you in here looking for chips … are you gay?” he asks the boy.
He continued, “You ain’t gay right?” He followed with a high-five and cheers of excitement after his son replied “no.”
You can watch a screengrab of the video below.
Blueface is facing backlash after asking his son if he's gay because he was looking for snacks instead of being in the living room with dancers pic.twitter.com/Z0fSdgqeuN
At the time of writing, Blueface appeared to have deleted the first part of the video, where he references “booty cheeks”. However, the video of him asking his son if he is gay remained online (Instagram stories disappear after 24 hours).
A video recorded a short while later shows Blueface leaving his kids on a sofa as he says he needs to “go fondle with these young women for a bit”. The next video shows what appears to be him shooting a video in a bedroom, with two women twerking on the bed. His kids are not in the room.
Who is Blueface?
Blueface grew up in LA. He began to gain attention as a rapper in 2018. In 2019, a remix of his song “Thotiana” (featuring Cardi B and YG), peaked at number 8 on the Billboard Hot 100. He released his debut studio album, Find the Beat, in 2020.
In 2022, Blueface and then-girlfriend, ChriseanRock, appeared at Pure Heat Community Festival during Atlanta Black Gay Pride weekend. The two performed Chrisean’s song “Vibe” on stage. They have since parted ways.
Earlier this year, Blueface posted a tweet which many took as meaning he’s bisexual. He said, “My hands is bisexual for anybody who feel a typa way get up with me.”
However, what he was apparently poorly expressing was that he’d happily fight both men and women if they gave him trouble, according to All HipHop. When his inbox was flooded with nudes from men, Blueface asked them to stop messaging him.
“Ever since i tweeted my hands bisexual its been a lot of LGBTQ sh*t going on in my DM [direct messages] that’s not what I meant cuz 😂🙅🏽♂️,” he tweeted.
“I go to click on a picture in my dm an you know how on Twitter it don’t show you the picture till you click on it…it’s a whole ngga on there spreading his a** open cuz like wtf is this that’s sexual harassment I ain’t sign up for this you can’t even dm me on here no more 🙅🏽♂️.”
Online, many expressed disgust at his latest video.
The saddest part about this to me is the line of questioning he just opened up for his son, I see it in kids all the time, they get bullied and accused of being gay and they hear it so much they start to question themselves because of what people are saying to them repeatedly.
Someone take the child away from these weirdos ! This is so weird ! The fact that you have $80,000 watches and not any food in your house tells us everything we need to know.
— Professional Big Titty Heaux💸 (@thegawdbambi) July 7, 2023
This is what I’m saying!! They’re so hung up on not letting their kids see two men kissing but allow this type of behavior and content to be spread. It’s so disturbing
We can't rely on mainstream media to tell our stories. That's why we don't lock Queerty articles behind a paywall. Will you support our mission with a contribution today?
Asking any 6 year old about their “sexuality” and trying to get them to watch naked women is a form of sexual abuse. That’s what Twitter is not clocking.
Mr. Blueface, like so many heterosexuals, should not be having children at all, but alas, nature works such that he seems to be able to create them without breaking a sweat. He has one incubating in the womb of yet another walking disaster, Chrisean Rock. I shudder to think about what her poor child(ren?) will have to endure with her as their mother….
One of the problems with children turning out bad is bad parents. Then add idiots and just outright unfit parents to living in hell type of communities and it’s amazing that 99% of the children don’t grow up misfits, criminals and etc..
Very true. As soon as guys reach the age that they can produce sperms AND girls make eggs they should be fitted with the medieval type of chastity devices that are only removed AFTER they demonstrate the mental capacity to be good parents.
Someone will have contacted Child Services, let´s hope. He clearly could use a/some parenting course(s). He can afford to pay for the courses privately, too.
Does anyone else notice the cognitive dissonance between this post and the Casey DeSantis post? On the Blueface post, the same commenters are horrified at clapping butt cheeks. In the Casey DeSantis post, it’s more of “Sure, men in fetish gear can dress up as dogs in tight clothing and bark at children? Why not? Casey DeSantis is a frigid shrew.” It’s almost like y’all want to sexualize children in certain instances to suit your political affiliation. And I’ll remind y’all that that’s what the Trump supporters do. Time and time again, you’re just like them. We should start a new Us Weekly feature. “Trump supporters…they’re just like US!”
To which Casey DeSantis article are you referring? The one about her promo video?
I’ve just checked the comments there and can’t see anybody posting in favour of leather-bound pups being around children. So where’s the double standard/hypocrisy?
That picture you keep brining up about the men in fetish gear: those men are not sexualising a child. And who brought that child there? Her straight parents.
This guy is literally, verbally, explicitly questioning his very young child’s sexuality, and imprinting homophobia. He is also a straight parent.
The problem is literally the same. The only difference: your partisan cheerleading. It’s petulant and childish. It’s in the same wheelhouse as conservatives doing a whataboutism with Hooters and Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders. All points lead to child sexualization. Grownups can see that. Grow a brain and a spine, Bosch.
The girl seeing men in fetish gear is the same as this boy seeing strippers in the living room. That is not sexualisation of children. Potentially inappropriate, but it doesn’t sexualise the child.
The problem here is that the boy is being questioned about his sexuality. That is sexualisation of a child. That is the thing that you and your republican friends are pretending to fight.
And a girl who believes in Santa Claus isn’t getting her sexuality questioned seeing tight-clad leather daddy with his sausages and balls in dog gear? What planet do you live on, Bosch? Come back to Earth with the rest of the adults.
No, she’s not. She’s seeing adults in funny clothes. No one is asking her if she finds it attractive. No one is asking if she’s a lesbian and then high-fiving her when she says no.
You might be confusing it with child beauty pageants, where they put the children in sexualising clothes. Is that what you’re confusing it with? Because that’s sexualisation of children.
Kinks and fetishes should only be displayed when all parties involved are consenting. When you are in public, the public is a party involved and children cannot consent. Can children consent to your kink sexual fetishes being displayed openly and then having that picture blasted all over the Internet for pervs? They cannot. Get your head out of your a$$, Bosch. Extract that head and sniff reality.
I think what others are getting at is that they are different things.
Sexual exposure vs sexualisation.
In the case of DeSantis, the children were exposed to sexual things (kinks) by their parents who chose to take them to the parade. Of course it COULD be argued that if parades are supposed to be inclusive, this would extend to children and therefore dressing in kink might not be appropriate because should children be exposed to sexual things? No. But ultimately the (straight) parents chose to take them.
In the case of Blueface, the child was exposed to sexual things (women) – which, agreed, is akin to the DeSantis situation and therefore the parents in both situations should be condemned, however Blueface went one further my asking his child his sexuality. That then sexualises the child which is more abhorrent and wasn’t present in the DeSantis case. That’s the difference.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
dbmcvey
Should anyone be surprised that the guy with the face tattoo is an idiot.
Louis
Two things to say about this.
1. Regardless of sexuality, aged 6 you’re likely to care more about food than naked people.
2. That doesn’t always stop into adulthood. I’d much rather a slice of cake than watch some rando men twerk in my living room.
m
Same here!
Mack
Pretty much what I was going to say. You can’t fix stupid.
Jack Meoff
Can’t it be both? 🙂
jcool
sometimes kids feel uncomfortable when their dad brings hookers into the house
m
Grooming much? Kid needs to leave home asap when he is able too.
Donston
Asking any 6 year old about their “sexuality” and trying to get them to watch naked women is a form of sexual abuse. That’s what Twitter is not clocking.
abfab
He should be taken from the home. CALL CPS!
My2CentsWorth
I wonder if the idiot would accept his son later on if he is homosexual or bi-sexual.
Hopefully, for the boy, the father will have gotten out of his life before then.
still_onthemark
Evidently his face turned blue as a result of brain damage after a session of masturbatory auto-asphyxiation.
Bosch
I’m sure they’ll find a way to blame drag queens for this.
abfab
The little tike could be ”pre gay”. Thank you Larry David.
Kangol2
Mr. Blueface, like so many heterosexuals, should not be having children at all, but alas, nature works such that he seems to be able to create them without breaking a sweat. He has one incubating in the womb of yet another walking disaster, Chrisean Rock. I shudder to think about what her poor child(ren?) will have to endure with her as their mother….
abfab
I totally agree. Opposite sex couples are so last century. This is one ugly man.
My2CentsWorth
Agree with you.
monty clift
Blueface, more like dumbface. Imagine having this tattooed idiot as a father. Hopefully, the kid doesn’t turn out like him.
My2CentsWorth
One of the problems with children turning out bad is bad parents. Then add idiots and just outright unfit parents to living in hell type of communities and it’s amazing that 99% of the children don’t grow up misfits, criminals and etc..
Godabed
there really should be a permit process to have kids.
My2CentsWorth
Very true. As soon as guys reach the age that they can produce sperms AND girls make eggs they should be fitted with the medieval type of chastity devices that are only removed AFTER they demonstrate the mental capacity to be good parents.
Diplomat
I’d hate to have seen what woulda happened if that little boy had said yes. Whooole heepah trouble be set’n in on that little boys beehind.
Fahd
Someone will have contacted Child Services, let´s hope. He clearly could use a/some parenting course(s). He can afford to pay for the courses privately, too.
rayk81
But the LGBTQ community are the groomers? Right lol. He shouldn’t be asking a 6-year-old boy that question and shouldn’t have half-naked women around.
sagitarius10
Bully in training! This is the way it starts with all bullies!
SFMike
The facial tat says it all, I’m stupid so nothing else ignorant he’s going to say or do is going to be a big surprise.
G-Man
That is just plain ignorant! If the kid does turn out to be Gay he certainly won’t feel comfortable sharing with his idiot father.
decrans
Does anyone else notice the cognitive dissonance between this post and the Casey DeSantis post? On the Blueface post, the same commenters are horrified at clapping butt cheeks. In the Casey DeSantis post, it’s more of “Sure, men in fetish gear can dress up as dogs in tight clothing and bark at children? Why not? Casey DeSantis is a frigid shrew.” It’s almost like y’all want to sexualize children in certain instances to suit your political affiliation. And I’ll remind y’all that that’s what the Trump supporters do. Time and time again, you’re just like them. We should start a new Us Weekly feature. “Trump supporters…they’re just like US!”
Louis
To which Casey DeSantis article are you referring? The one about her promo video?
I’ve just checked the comments there and can’t see anybody posting in favour of leather-bound pups being around children. So where’s the double standard/hypocrisy?
decrans
More specifically abfab and Queerty’s overall tone
Bosch
That picture you keep brining up about the men in fetish gear: those men are not sexualising a child. And who brought that child there? Her straight parents.
This guy is literally, verbally, explicitly questioning his very young child’s sexuality, and imprinting homophobia. He is also a straight parent.
Seems to me like the problem is straight parents.
decrans
The problem is literally the same. The only difference: your partisan cheerleading. It’s petulant and childish. It’s in the same wheelhouse as conservatives doing a whataboutism with Hooters and Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders. All points lead to child sexualization. Grownups can see that. Grow a brain and a spine, Bosch.
Bosch
“The problem is literally the same. ”
The girl seeing men in fetish gear is the same as this boy seeing strippers in the living room. That is not sexualisation of children. Potentially inappropriate, but it doesn’t sexualise the child.
The problem here is that the boy is being questioned about his sexuality. That is sexualisation of a child. That is the thing that you and your republican friends are pretending to fight.
decrans
And a girl who believes in Santa Claus isn’t getting her sexuality questioned seeing tight-clad leather daddy with his sausages and balls in dog gear? What planet do you live on, Bosch? Come back to Earth with the rest of the adults.
dbmcvey
What a shock. Jarod is here to support this nasty groomer with the face tattoo.
Bosch
No, she’s not. She’s seeing adults in funny clothes. No one is asking her if she finds it attractive. No one is asking if she’s a lesbian and then high-fiving her when she says no.
You might be confusing it with child beauty pageants, where they put the children in sexualising clothes. Is that what you’re confusing it with? Because that’s sexualisation of children.
decrans
Nope. Wrong again. I’m here to call out your faux outrage and hypocrisy. As usual, you have nothing to add. Just the usual blabberings.
decrans
Kinks and fetishes should only be displayed when all parties involved are consenting. When you are in public, the public is a party involved and children cannot consent. Can children consent to your kink sexual fetishes being displayed openly and then having that picture blasted all over the Internet for pervs? They cannot. Get your head out of your a$$, Bosch. Extract that head and sniff reality.
decrans
How do you know? Did you interview her? Thank you, Alyssa Milano.
Bosch
And yet they still weren’t sexualising her. Kids don’t have the context to understand that men dressed as dogs is a sexual thing.
That kid was there because her straight parents brought her there. Quit blaming the gays.
decrans
And yet, her image of men in sexual fetish gear is broadcasted all over the Internet for pervs. She didn’t consent to that. Try again, Bosch.
Louis
@decrans
I think what others are getting at is that they are different things.
Sexual exposure vs sexualisation.
In the case of DeSantis, the children were exposed to sexual things (kinks) by their parents who chose to take them to the parade. Of course it COULD be argued that if parades are supposed to be inclusive, this would extend to children and therefore dressing in kink might not be appropriate because should children be exposed to sexual things? No. But ultimately the (straight) parents chose to take them.
In the case of Blueface, the child was exposed to sexual things (women) – which, agreed, is akin to the DeSantis situation and therefore the parents in both situations should be condemned, however Blueface went one further my asking his child his sexuality. That then sexualises the child which is more abhorrent and wasn’t present in the DeSantis case. That’s the difference.
dbmcvey
I love Jordan talking about some hypothetical woman offended by this when his roommate is a NAZI.