When it rains, it pours.
As Donald Trump prepares for his arraignment in the Stormy Daniels case tomorrow, there’s been a new development in the Justice Department’s ongoing investigation into his alleged mishandling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.
According to a bombshell report by The Washington Post, the DOJ has obtained more evidence suggesting potential obstruction by Trump that could be enough for a grand jury to charge him.
Investigators believe the ex-president went through several of the top secret documents being stored at his Florida compound even after he received a subpoena from the Justice Department demanding the files be returned to decide which ones he wanted to keep.
Related:
Tom Ford is about to make life even more awkward for Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago
The fashion designer and the former White House occupant have had a contentious relationship in the press over the years.
Per WaPo:
In the classified documents case, federal investigators have gathered new and significant evidence that after the subpoena was delivered, Trump looked through the contents of some of the boxes of documents in his home, apparently out of a desire to keep certain things in his possession, the people familiar with the investigation said.
Investigators now suspect, based on witness statements, security camera footage, and other documentary evidence, that boxes including classified material were moved from a Mar-a-Lago storage area after the subpoena was served, and that Trump personally examined at least some of those boxes, these people said. While Trump’s team returned some documents with classified markings in response to the subpoena, a later FBI search found more than 100 additional classified items that had not been turned over.
Investigators are now trying to determine Trump’s motives for what he did.
Neither the FBI nor the DOJ has commented on the matter, but a spokesperson for the one-term, twice-impeached, once-indicted ex-president predictably called the entire thing “corrupt” and a “witch hunt.”
“The witch-hunts against President Trump have no basis in facts or law,” Steven Cheung said in a statement on Trump’s behalf. “The deranged special counsel and the DoJ have now resorted to prosecutorial misconduct by illegally leaking information to corrupt the legal process and weaponize the justice system in order to manipulate public opinion and conduct election interference, because they are clearly losing all across the board.”
Meanwhile, here’s what folx on Twitter are saying…
He was just looking for the coolest-looking folders to keep, right?
— Ryan Statz (@ziggurcat) April 2, 2023
Trump admitted he would do it too, lol. pic.twitter.com/r1qambbpp7
— Paul 👻 (@pablo_honey1) April 2, 2023
It’s not looking good for Don the Con.
— Jeff Dannenberg (@jecrda) April 2, 2023
So his tiny little fingerprints are all over them?
— I just can’t even 😶 (@KikiDisMe1) April 3, 2023
Guys, I’m starting to think maybe Trump committed some crimes.
— Monarch’s Woke Ghost (@GLDNST8) April 2, 2023
So it really sounds like there’s a ton of evidence Trump personally tried hiding the things he knew were classified yet wanted to keep.
— Louise, please 💙 (@jerseymouse) April 2, 2023
When Hannity asked him about moving documents, he said he had every right to. Sounded like a confession to me.
— Hopeful for 2022 (@hopeful2024) April 3, 2023
Dude is SO going to jail.
— NeroWesten (@NeroWesten) April 2, 2023
Last week, Trump sat down with Sean Hannity at Fox News and basically confessed to everything he’s currently being investigated for by the Justice Department.
When Hannity asked him point-blank, “I can’t imagine you ever saying: ‘Bring me some of the boxes that we brought back from the White House. I’d like to look at them.’ Did you ever do that?” the ex-president replied, “I would have the right to do that. There’s nothing wrong with it.”
Related:
These Melania tweets about Donald Trump’s indictment are just too good
Donald Trump made history again yesterday when he became the first-ever U.S. president to be criminally indicted.
“But I know you,” Hannity countered. “I don’t think you would do it.” To which Trump answered that he most certainly would, saying: “Well, I don’t have a lot of time. But I would have the right to do that,” he said, before adding that, in fact, “I would do that. There would be nothing wrong.”
“I have the right to take stuff,” he continued. “I have the right to look at stuff. But they have the right to talk, and we have the right to talk.”
Trump is expect to arrive in New York later today ahead of tomorrow’s arraignment at the Manhattan Criminal Courts Building. It’s not clear whether he will make remarks to the media before before or after his court appearance, but it’s no doubt going to be a circus.
still_onthemark
Good photo, lol. Trump HATES profile photos that show off his fat yet shriveled turkey neck.
smittoons
Hannity is so obsequious in that interview, it makes my skin crawl.
Maddening to think how many people will go to their graves insisting this scumbag was still a better choice than Hillary Clinton, who is currently happily running around producing shows, writing books, watching musicals and teaching university courses, all while definitely not facing any indictments.
Openminded
Word of the day: Obsequious- Obedient or attentive to an excessive or servile degree.
Thought I’d save the rest of you the trouble of looking it up. Thanks, smittoons, for expanding our vocabulary. Seriously
Kangol2
Hannity is a total lickspittle in that interview but like many FoxNews phonies, he had different ideas about Don the Con in private.
My question remains: why did a majority of White women vote against their interests in 2016 and again in 2020, for Don the Con, as opposed to a fellow White woman who CLEARLY had the interests of most women of ALL races–as well as the American people–at the forefront of her campaign? And will they do it again in 2024? I mean, how much clearer to the anti-women, anti-LGBTQ, anti-Black, anti-immigrantm anti-children, anti-science, etc. GQP have to be to wake people up?
abfab
Yes! More vocabulary please!
Kangol if you can, squeeze the Log Cabin Republicans into your questions why. Do they still lurk here, searching for a chance to enlighten us? Poor Boys.
PubisHairus
If you *must* post about conservative trash, more George Santos content and less Trump news, please. Santos is ~allegedly~ gay, so it would make more sense to blast his arse on here.