Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
 

Ann Coulter Makes Journo Wonder

coulter_adamsapple-3.jpg
Humankind has long questioned conservative pundit Ann Coulter’s gender identity and Cape Cod blogger Aaron Maloy is no exception:

Nobody knows for sure the exact gender of Ann Coulter. People have asked her on several occasions and each time she went into drag mode shaking her head, rolling her eyes and deliver a verbal smackdown.

One thing is for sure though, straight women don’t behave or talk as she does. And so she is my favorite Republican Gender Bender.

We’re sure Coulter would be proud. On a related note, our sources at the North Pole tell us Coulter asked Santa for a full-functioning, self-lubricating vagina. He said she’s been too naughty, though. Sorry, Ann, maybe next year!

By:           Andrew Belonksy
On:           Dec 20, 2007
Tagged: , , , , ,
  • 30 Comments
    • No. 1 · The Atarian

      Forget about the Adam’s Apple. I’ve seen plenty of women with the ol’ oversized larynx. But my Ghod, look at that face!!! It’s a man, baby!What really amazes me, whether or not you believe (s)he’s a man or a woman, is how I’ve heard so many right-wingers say that they think she’s “hot”. PUH-LEEEEZE! This is one scary face, no matter what your sexual orientation.(Please cue the SFX of cookies being tossed.)

      Dec 20, 2007 at 9:54 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 2 · beefy

      atarian-
      they think she’s hot because of their underlying desire to have gay sex!

      Dec 20, 2007 at 10:06 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 3 · Jay

      What new news.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 10:26 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 4 · todd

      Mann did too much acid when she was a dead head, now his brains are scrambled eggs. He’s like 6’2″!!

      Dec 20, 2007 at 10:45 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 5 · mozzer13

      The reason I hate this discussion is because every time it pops up on a blog, the comments are typically attempts to insult her by basically calling her a tranny. Ann Coulter is a terrible thing, but being a tranny isn’t. Can’t we get a bit more original than this?

      Dec 20, 2007 at 11:10 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 6 · jbran

      Hear, hear, mozzer13.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 11:30 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 7 · Woof

      Trannies in general are not terrible, however, I am sure there are terrible Trannies out there, she would just be one of them.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 12:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 8 · Shaun

      someone just needs to run her through with a whaling harpoon. please?

      Dec 20, 2007 at 12:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 9 · Matt

      I totally agree with mozzer13′s cautionary point. That said, she would be a Bad Tranny if she’s being a hyper-hypocritical genderbender analogous to hyper-hypocrites like Sen Craig and the various others Senators, Representatives, State legislators, and reverends.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 1:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 10 · Richard

      I want begin by saying that I think of myself as a feminist, but are we allowed to use the word “cunt” on this site?

      Dec 20, 2007 at 1:02 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 11 · hells kitchen guy

      I despise her very being, but the fact is, she’s a very attractive woman. Can we attack her on her ideas and ignore her looks, please?

      Dec 20, 2007 at 1:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 12 · JJ

      You call that attractive? Hate to see what you call ugly.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 1:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 13 · HL

      As a lady, I will allow the usage of cunt.

      Yes, equating her with being a bad tranny isn’t cool. But I think deep down, we all hope she really is a he, so Ann can get the award for biggest hypocrite in recent history award.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 1:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 14 · thatguyfromboston

      she’s doesn’t look like a tranny, she looks like someone in bad drag is all. I went as her for halloween, it took one pair of pumps, one lowcut little black dress, and 1 stringy blonde wig, and I was transformed into a slightly more feminine version of ann coulter. the whole costume cost less than 15 dollars.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 2:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 15 · Heather_L_James

      Couple of things, as a transsexual myself I have to say, first and foremost, we don’t want her. So if she is trans I suggest we have some sort of queer draft akin to the racial draft that Dave Chapelle did on his television show. The straights can have her and Joe Solomonese and we will take the Beckhams.

      Annie does have some very male facial characteristics, though, aside from the adam’s apple; low set brows, a thin upper lip and a forehead you could land a 757 on and a more square jaw than I ever had. The chin is all woman, though.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 2:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 16 · Gregg

      mozzer13 is absolutely right. This discussion is nothing more than schoolyard name-calling.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 3:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 17 · Jack Jett

      I bet he has a huge dick.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 3:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 18 · Stuart

      I would agree with some of you on here and I might even feel sorry for Ann if she didnt make her living off of name calling. Please just look at her work. If it wasnt for name calling she would have maybe half a book of materials between all of her writings. Hard to feel sorry for someone that has made sooooooo much money from name calling.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 4:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 19 · Lena Dahlstrom

      It’s offensive on a couple counts. 1) As mozzer13 points out it’s transphobic. 2) It’s sexist — attacking a woman for being “too masculine” is a all-too-typical way of trying to discredit her, as is attacking her looks instead her (lack of) substance. And 3) implying Coulter has anything to with trans folks… well them thar’s fighting words….

      For the folks who are cheering on these sorts of comments, I assume you’ll encourage right-wingers to attack Barney Frank for being effeminate? I thought not…

      Dec 20, 2007 at 5:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 20 · David

      Totally trans-phobic and overtly sexist. Grow up.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 6:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 21 · Matt

      Hm. Can we all just agree that she’s a horrible human being, and a disgrace to whatever sex and gender she may be (on the assumption that no one really wants to verify that question)? Vile, loathesome abomination, that’s what it is.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 6:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 22 · Zoe Brain

      And I have it on good authority that she’s a nigger passing as white too.

      Oh wait, it’s not acceptable to say things like that in 2007. But “she-male” is fine.

      The story, and the whole transphobic hypocrisy shown in it nauseates me.

      You know, all this stuff is being cached, and archived. And in 40 or 50 years time, this kind of thing will look exactly like the kind of racial slurs cast in newspapers against political opponents in the 50′s and 60′s. You’re going to look like the worst and most ignorant kind of bigots.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 10:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 23 · Abbie

      Yeah, this is flagrantly offensive. Not to mention very old and unoriginal.

      There’s plenty bad you can say about Anne Coulter without being transphobic.

      Dec 20, 2007 at 11:02 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 24 · Beth

      This whole “she’s really a man!” stuff implies that transwomen are not really women. That certainly is not the case. Coulter might not have much of a problem denying transpeople’s realities. Why is it that people who supposedly disagree with Coulter share this reprehensible outlook with her?

      Dec 20, 2007 at 11:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 25 · clay

      Oh look why decrying the poor oppressed transpeople
      Zoe Brain has to show her or his own racist bull. That’s the way change peoples minds pick on black people why not a homo slur? Mexican slur? Asian?. No because you wanted a rise out of someone.

      Why don’t we just all agree that she is an ugly human being based on her personality and views?

      Actually I think she may be a dinosaur who some how made it to 2007. Scientist should look into that.

      Dec 21, 2007 at 6:37 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 26 · courtney

      She’s got an Adam’s Apple, is more than 6’2, and has gargantuan man-hands. It’s a fair question and especially so given it would take her all of two blinks to put it in a not-so-delicate way to someone else.

      Dec 23, 2007 at 3:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 27 · james_boston

      I see all the P.C. types have come out of the woodwork…Ann Coulter is an ugly human being and the only way to hit someone like him/her is right where they live…it certainly would destroy her to hear these type of stories cause she loathes gays. And to those that are transgendered…let’s not pretend as if you and those of us who are gay, black, whatever (I’m actually half Black. half Irish and gay) necessarily share the same agenda. We use the word fag here all the time, why not he/she? By the way, to those who think there isn’t something to stereotypes…how about all these Lesbians and Transgenders who pop up bitchin’ and moaning any time they see something they feel is offensive. Humorless ball-breakers anyone?

      Dec 24, 2007 at 1:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 28 · MauraHennessey

      This thread is disgusting. Some of the gay men here feel absolutely free to slam, women, transwomen and the legitimacy of post ops as women to take a few shots at the reationary Ann Coulter.

      “Self lubricating vagina?”

      A similiar comment from Lesbians or transsexuals concerning a gay man would be considered vile and outrageous. It concerns me as a Lesbian and a member of the larger Queer community when I see just how much contempt the rest of us are held in by some gay men.

      Dec 24, 2007 at 1:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 29 · GirlInside

      I find it a little offensive that everyone here is taking offense at the thought that Ann Coulter might be transsexual. Even though many of us disagree with her politics, if she is transsexual, isn’t that simply a piece of evidence in favor of the idea that transsexuals can be successful?

      Why are we gender-variant people afraid that she might be like us in some way? It’s because our morality and our sanity is called into question every time one of us does something crazy, just like with any oppressed minority. If she is transsexual, we shouldn’t be treating her like gender-normative people treat us.

      If she’s a genetic woman, then I feel really sorry for her. It can’t be easy to be a genetic woman and look masculine enough to be mistaken for a transsexual.

      Jan 14, 2008 at 1:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 30 · kelli busey

      you all are repressing a lesbian/gay/tranny/coulter fetishist desires. Seek help or just watch the vid again.
      Go Trannies, go

      Feb 2, 2008 at 1:57 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Queerty now requires you to log in to comment

    Please log in to add your comment.

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     




    GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.