Dear celebrities,
If you take pictures of your junk and send them to other people, we will find them.
Love,
The Internet
Seems like the message came a little too late for Hunger Games star and too cute straight ally Josh Hutcherson, who is the latest celebrity literally caught with his pants down in a sexting scandal. (No, it’s not a gay sexting scandal, and we’re pretty upset about that.)
According to Life of the Rich and Famous, the photo you’re looking at below (the uncensored version, of course) is a shot of Hutcherson’s beautiful peen, which he used to send to ladies on an unnamed dating site—along with a video of himself beating his meat—under the alias “Connor.”
While it’s essential to point out that Josh has a younger bother named Connor who could have inspired the alias, you should also know that almost everyone is calling BS. Unfortunately, this dude is standing at an angle that would hide Hutcherson’s giant tattoo, so no dice on identifying marks.
Whoever this man is, one thing’s for sure: The person that claims to be withholding a video of Josh Hutcherson playing with his joystick is truly evil, and we won’t believe a word of it until we see it in full. (Please send to us, thanks.)
tardis
There’s gotta be more to life than getting excited over a naked man, right? I mean…who cares really?
davegun2
@tardis: Who really care? I DO.
Wilbready
Tardis, if there is, I don’t want any part of it!
Milk
That’s what life is all about. Getting excited over naked men.
hf2hvit
I WANT ASS!
Wilbready
hf2hvit, how cum you don’t have any?
Teleny
@tardis: amen. I don’t get it. We’ve all seen penis and/vaginas before. I don’t get the fascination, unless its someone running for public office or works with children.
Red Meat
That’s not him (unfortinatley). I just looked at some beach photos of him and he has a bit larger nipples, a wide happy trail. and he has a bit more meat all around.
Your welcome.
Wilbready
Red Meat, you are doing good work there. Even if it is not him, can we all agree the man in the pic is sexy?
Bob LaBlah
It might be my midde-aged way of thinking but I just don’t see the “gay” angle to this story. To me this is an modern day attempt to do to this guy what was done to a now long forgotten young actor named Robby Benson back in the 1980’s. A photo of him on the set sitting on the ground with a pair of shorts on and the print of his briefs showing seemed to convince the gay community that he was gay. A few years later in an interview he said that he strongly suspected it was a “person” on the set whom he rebuffed that took the picture and started the rumor. His career came to a screeching halt after that interview. Personally, I never thought that he was gay, though I did fantasize about banging the hell out of him because he was cute.
*
We now live in the digital video age. Even if a video of him surfaced with him jacking off unless another guy was “helping” him I would see no GAY evidence. Strait men do things like that nowadays. Don’t believe me? Look at the guy running for mayor in NYC and the shit that he has sent to women over the internet. Does that make him gay?
Homophile
@Bob LaBlah:
The “”gay” angle to this story”, is it’s a pic of a c*ck. The gays just love the c*ck. They can’t get enough of it. I love it, you love it, the folks who posted above love it. We love c*ck.
Matthew Tharrett
@Bob LaBlah: Who said he was gay?
mz.sam
Look closer, guys. For identifying authenticity the next question is, does Josh have the same small tattoo inscription on the person’s right hip as seen on the photo?
GayTampaCowboy
I just went to the site to see the uncensored pic and it’s quite nice!
What does this really say? Pretty much that guys like taking pics of their junk and sending it to others (be they men, women or both). If you don’t think this will help sell tickets to the new Hunger Games movie, you’re nuts!
Hey, i’m all for celebrating the male form – especially one that’s built like that! 🙂
DistingueTraces
@Teleny: Really? A worked-up political “scandal” would make it more interesting to you?
Now that’s something we’ve seen before, something that holds no surprises, no beauty, no possibility of discovery.
But I think you’ll find that you’re pretty lonely in the feeling that because you’ve seen a set of genitals before, you have no interest in the unveiling of another person’s nakedness. There, you have always the promise of something truly new.
B Damion
Awww..I hope it isn’t true. I really like him. He seems like a really nice guy. I hate scandal like this when it happens to nice people.
SoThenWhatHappened
@tardis:
ohhhhh, girl. aren’t you superior!
Charles Etheridge
As generally good looking as he is, it’s truly a shame that the photo was censored at all. Who in the world could really have been hurt by it, other than some arch conservative that we would all be better off without.
yesorno
Seriously?
Josh have 3 Tattos.
1st on his neck, 2nd on his side, 3rd on his arm !!
BUT HE’S NO LETTERING ON HIS HIP !!!
yesorno
*And he is built wider
GayMafiaKingpin
Funny, those criticizing others for being interested in nude photos, asking “Who cares?”
Considering you clicked on a headline about leaked nude photos, to even see this page, I’m going to guess that you care.
Terrycloth
The picture I see is covered when I click for the Un censored picture it says not found..why bother .? Hes better as a blond… curiosity of course is why I clicked..then got duped
Frank McGinness
@Homophile: Ah c-ck. That 4,000 year old word derived from Egyptian hieroglyph brother to sister c-nt