The University of Indiana says it won’t fire a professor who made blatantly racist, sexist, and homophobic remarks, citing the man’s First Amendment rights.
Eric Rasmusen is a professor of business economics and public policy in the Kelley School of Business. He recently came under fire after sharing an article on Twitter titled, “Are Women Destroying Academia? Probably” and pulling a quote from it that said, “geniuses are overwhelmingly male.”
“geniuses are overwhelmingly male because they combine outlier high IQ with moderately low Agreeableness and moderately low Conscientiousness.” https://t.co/cyfBX1ECSc
— Eric Rasmusen (@erasmuse) November 7, 2019
This prompted online sleuths to dig further into Rasmusen’s past, where years of bigoted statements made by him were uncovered, including calling gay men “promiscuous” and declaring they should be forbidden from teaching because they’ll sexually abuse male students.
“Male homosexuals, at least, like boys and are generally promiscuous,” Rasmusen said in 2003. “They are more likely than heterosexuals to go after the youngsters under their care.”
“They should not be given the opportunity to satisfy their desires.”
Another time, he declared Black students unfit to attend elite institutions because they are intellectually inferior to white students.
In a letter, Provost Lauren Robel writes: “Professor Eric Rasmusen has, for many years, used his private social media accounts to disseminate his racist, sexist, and homophobic views.”
“I condemn, in the strongest terms, Professor Rasmusen’s views on race, gender, and sexuality, and I think others should condemn them,” Robel continued, then added his remarks are “stunningly ignorant” and “bigoted.”
But, she said, the school can’t fire him because the posts were made “as a private citizen” and “as vile and stupid as they are … the First Amendment of the United States Constitution forbids us to do so.”
Robel did say, however, that students may transfer out of Rasmusen’s classes without penalty. For those who choose to stay enrolled, the university has implemented a blind grading system that allows them to anonymously submit assignments without fear of being discriminated against by their professor.
“If other steps are needed to protect our students or colleagues from bigoted actions, Indiana University will take them,” Robel added. “My main goal here is to have the students understand that they’ll be judged on their merits and not on their sex, their race, or their sexual orientation.”
In response, Rasmusen, who has been employed at the university since 1992, issued a statement claiming his views had been “misrepresented” before doubling down on them.
Not only did he stand by his position that gay men should not be allowed to teach because they’ll rape students, but he called affirmative action corrupt.
“The whole idea of affirmative action is that too few black students (would) get in without racial preferences,” he said, “so we need to lower the standard for them and accept that they will do worse academically.”
Rasmusen then went on to accuse the university of encouraging bias by “condemning a dissident professor.”
“There are views you’re not supposed to express, even outside of class,” he griped, “and God help the conservative student whose professor checks Facebook and Twitter before grading term papers.”
PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
Wondering how long til they find a trove of kiddie porn on this repugnant reprehensive noxious puke’s computer…..
rustyiam
Affirmative action is corrupt, most people know this to be true except for a few cry babies out there who want everything THEIR way, which will never happen 😉
Cam
Awwwww, the desperation of the right wing troll account trying to deflect the topic off of anti-LGBT bigotry.
Sweetie, tell your manager at the troll farm to cut your pay, you’re not great at this.
lcandela123
Sad that the Provost of a university has no idea what the first amendment actually means.
MacAdvisor
Yes, the Provost does. He knows his institution is a state facility, owned and operated by a governmental entity. As a state actor, the restrictions of the First Amendment apply through operation of the 14th Amendment. As such, employees are free to speak their mind in their private capacity without punishment by the University. Moreover, even at a private institution, academic freedom would permit the free exchange of ideas.
Free speech does not mean people only get to say approved things. It means people get to say things you don’t like. The answer is not to silence them, but speak out to show how they are wrong.
Jacob
@MacAdvisor
Two things:
1) Actions have consequences in the public AND private sphere.
2) How do you expect someone to change their mind and learn how they are wrong *just by talking to them* when they’re super dogmatic in their dumb beliefs in the first place?
Diplomat-G
@mcadviser,
How on earth does the 14th amendment even apply to this? Additionally, this is not covered under freedom of speech. Defamation (including libel and slander) is not a protected right under the first amendment.
Cam
They will find out this guy has settled date rape charges in his past.
dhmonarch89
so- they won’t fire him…students should boycott his classes. Not surprised it’s Mike Pence’s state, if he does get fired- Trump will make him Sec. of Educ in his 2nd term (Dems fighting too much and favoring people who won’t win the Russ belt- making nightmare more likely to come true by the week)
wikidBSTN
They shouldn’t fire him because of what he said, but because he is stupid enough to believe what he said. What university wants dumb, ill-informed profs??
gymmuscleboy
“(Homosexuals) are more likely than heterosexuals to go after the youngsters under their care” – is that statistically correct?
Diplomat-G
@gymmuscleboy
No, it is often falsely believed that men with homosexual orientations cannot be trusted around male children and that their sexual impulse control is poor. But the research data on this topic makes clear that sexual orientation alone is not a risk factor for pedophilia or for committing sexual crimes against children or teens or anyone. Sexual orientation by itself is irrelevant to child sexual abuse behavior or risks.