Fred Karger walked into a coffee shop in Manhattan looking every inch the sort of man who wants to be a Republican presidential candidate.
The long-time “Grand Old Party” operative, who has served three different Republican presidents, had close-cropped grey hair and wore a sharp blue business suit. He clutched a folder of campaign literature and handed out a T-shirt emblazoned with “Iowa 2012”. But one key detail made Karger a little different in a Republican field swirling with names like Jeb Bush, Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee. On his suit lapel Karger wore a badge pairing the Stars and Stripes with the rainbow colours of the gay rights movement.
Karger, 61, whose 2012 presidential exploratory committee is perhaps the furthest advanced of any potential Republican candidate, is openly gay. When he officially declares his run, he will not only be the first gay Republican presidential candidate but also the first such candidate from any political party in American history. “I am a fighter and I am trying to change the Republican party and to open it up to everybody. If every gay person left the Republican party and went to the Democrats, that would be stupid. I believe in smaller federal government and personal responsibility just like my hero, Ronald Reagan,” Karger said over a chicken salad sandwich and a cola.
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
There is no doubting Karger’s Republican credentials. He has spent his life working for the party’s cause as a top strategist. Like Karl Rove, he was a disciple of the controversial Republican tactician Lee Atwater. Indeed, Karger played a key role in publicising the “Willie Horton” adverts that destroyed the Democratic candidate Michael Dukakis in 1988. Horton was a jailed murderer let out on a Dukakis-backed weekend release programme in Massachusetts who committed armed robbery, assault and rape while at large. Karger toured the country with relatives of Horton’s victims, dealing a fatal blow to Dukakis’s image. He does not regret it for a moment. “No, not in the least,” he said with a smile.
But there is, obviously, doubt over Karger’s chances in a field likely to be dominated by people with higher name recognition who are heterosexuals in a party with a dominant social conservative wing. Yet Karger is already at work in Iowa and New Hampshire, the key first states in the nomination process. He has visited Iowa five times and New Hampshire 11 times in the past year. He has had aired TV adverts (the only potential candidate to do so) and held town hall meetings, attracted volunteers and even hired staff.
He is bluntly honest about the fact that he is a virtual unknown. His campaign slogan adorning the T-shirts, badges and frisbees he gives out asks: “Fred who?” Yet it’s a strategy that has earned him a wave of positive press coverage, including a profile in the Washington Post. Karger knows that winning the 2012 Republican nomination as a proud proclaimed gay man is a long shot. But getting in the televised candidate debates might not be. By the spring he will probably have a ground operation, a media presence, campaign funds in the bank, a staff and a headquarters. That will allow Karger to put gay rights, including gay marriage, on the table in a party that usually contents itself with bluntly dismissing them. To say the least, it will make interesting viewing and unsettle the big names. “I will take the gloves off if necessary,” he said. He believes his campaign can raise $5m.
Since coming out several years ago, Karger has been a vocal campaigner for gay rights and a high-profile critic of organisations, especially the Mormon church, that oppose gay marriage.
Perhaps, then, it is no wonder the Republican establishment is trying its best to exclude him. Last week’s meeting of the influential Conservative Political Action Committee in Washington did not invite Karger to speak, though Karger used the snub to generate media attention to his cause. “I cannot help but think that I have been excluded solely because I happen to be gay… I am not some two-headed monster. I want to squash the anti-gay rhetoric,” he said.
During his trips to Iowa and New Hampshire, often speaking to gay student groups, Karger noticed that he was getting a lot of emails from young gay people saying his ambitions had helped their lives where they faced prejudice and bullying. Karger remembered feeling isolated when he was closeted for most of his life and does not want others to go through that experience. Having an openly gay man run for the presidency is vital, he believes, even if he fails.
He says the symbolism of paving the way is important, just like it has been with pioneering but ultimately unsuccessful women such as Hillary Clinton and black candidates like the Rev Jesse Jackson. Somewhere in America, Karger hopes, a young gay person will see his run and think: I can do that, too, one day. “I am doing this for younger people,” says Karger. “I am fine now. I am happy in my skin. But when I was growing up it was hell. I don’t want anyone to go through that. That is what motivates me to make my voice heard. No more Mr Nice Gay.”
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2010
jj
Fred’s an interesting guy. I do think its great to have an openly gay Republican running. It would make more sense for him to have run for Congress first and then run for President. Someone who’s only government experience is being one of Lee Atwater’s henchmen really isn’t qualified for office. I will say he is a lot smarter than Sarah Palin and she has held a state office, though not a national one.
Steve
To be honest, I don’t understand why conservatives don’t support gay marriage. They support smaller government, and keeping the government out of whetehr or not your relationship is valid or not is about as small as it can get.
Then again, most conservatives are religious, therefore, creating conflict with small government and telling everyone to not be gay.
SouthSideShorty
@jj: Agreed, F.K. is an interesting character, and no one can argue he’s blazing trails for the gay right, but you’re spot-on in your assessment that he should aim a little lower. Governor, congressman, whatever; if he wants people to take him seriously and not think he’s just showboating, he’s going to have to prove that he’s a man who works for all people, and not just an ambassador from MoVille.
justiceontherocks
@jj: If he’s serious about getting elected he’s obviously starting in the wrong place. And he does bring some baggage. It will be interesting to see how he does.
tjr101
Even though I’ll never vote for him in a general I do wish him all the best, just to see conservatives irritated by his mere presence in the GOP primaries.
Soupy
Yes, the flies in the ointment of GOP leadership are always more interesting than the pigs who dominate it.
SouthSideShorty
@tjr101: @Soupy: I thought this was a site for adults, not sharp-clawed teenagers. You girls go play somewhere else and leave the political talk to the grown-ups, hear?
Marc
@SouthSideShorty:
Well, why not aim as ridiculously high as possible, since there’s no chance of the GOP acclaiming him at any level?
Soupy
Oh South Side, we all know that you are actually Willow Palin. Save your personal barbs for your facebook page.
Queer Supremacist
This guy has never held public office and he’s STILL more qualified to be president than President Hussein, or any of the other deadbeats seeking the GOP nomination.
I’m voting for him no matter what, even if I have to write him in. The left has no right to whine about the long-dead Lee Atwater when it does not come to the table with clean hands when it comes to smear campaigns.
Right Wingers Are Socioptahs (John From England)
What a creep.
@Queer Supremacist: you’re just ill in the head.
It’s like me voting for a black person because they a black??
Lol, to all the above. I guess Louis farrahkhan is an INTERESTING candidate!?