Pity the New York Times columnist: Each week, they’re tasked with defining the social trends and mores of our entire doomed civilization and each week they reach hilariously inaccurate conclusions that read like dispatches from the land of Upper East Narnia. Take Susan Cheever’s post yesterday on the New York Times’ alcohol blog, Proof. Once upon a time she was a raging boozehound and New York was full of boozy out-of-control drunks, but now that she’s sober, New York City has miraculously given up its drinking ways and become a more civilized place. Funny how that works, eh?
Cheever marvels that:
The New York apartments and lofts which were once the scenes of old-fashioned drunken carnage – slurred speech, broken crockery, broken legs and arms, broken marriages and broken dreams – are now the scene of parties where both friendships and glassware survive intact. Everyone comes on time, behaves well, drinks a little wine, eats a few tiny canapés, and leaves on time. They all still drink, but no one gets drunk anymore. Neither do they smoke. What on earth has happened?
I’ll take “You replaced your alcoholism with an irritating need to project your problems onto the world” for $1,000, Alex.
Cheever uses gay journo Benoit Denizet-Lewis’s new book America Anonymous as evidence that she’s not just a bitter dried up drunk making fun of people who still drink. Did we forget to mention the title of her piece is ‘Drunkenfreude’? The book talks about:
“An experiment done by Vancouver professor Bruce Alexander in which rats in small cages were compared to rats in a specially designed Rat Heaven, a room where lab rats had everything that lab rats like. The rats in cages drank 16 times as much of the sugary morphine solution offered than the rats in Rat Heaven. Can addictions be controlled just by circumstances? Are parties and vacations an overlooked way to treat alcoholism?
In the old days, drunkenness was as much part of New York City society as evening clothes. This is the city where Zelda Fitzgerald jumped wildly in the fountain in front of the Plaza, the city of “Breakfast at Tiffany’s,” written by another fabulous alcoholic, Truman Capote. It’s the city of late nights with sloshed celebrities at the Stork Club. It’s the city that gave its name to Manhattans and Bronx Cocktails, the city of John O’Hara and Frank O’Hara, of drunken brilliance and brilliant drunks.
I don’t drink. I know the savage, destructive power of alcoholism. It’s a soul stealer. Yet, there’s a mischievous part of me that misses all that extreme behavior, all those nasty but somehow amusing surprises, all that glamor even when so much of it ended in pain, institutions and early death. For us sober people there is a kind of drunkenfreude to watching others embarrass themselves, mangle their words and do things they will regret in the morning – if they even remember them in the morning.”
Here’s some fun fact about alcoholics that Cheever seems to be unaware of:
1.) Alcoholics think everything is about them.
2.) Alcoholics love to talk about alcohol.
So, is it any surprise that when Cheever was a drunken besotted mess (presumably throwing crockery around perfectly respectable society parties) she saw the Big Apple bobbing in a vat of Long Island Iced Tea and now that she stopped drinking she sees it as a decorous place where everyone behaves and nobody winds up blacking out at the end of the night? But of course, it can’t just be her. Instead, the entire city of New York has changed into a teetotaling town.
Now in all fairness, practically every Frank Rich column ever written is based on the “Because this personal experience or feeling is true for me, it must be true for everybody” format, but Frank Rich isn’t fucking with our cocktails. Maybe the reason you never get invited to any of the good parties anymore is that you’re such a buzzkill, Susan Cheever. Stop smirking at us while we sing “Total Eclipse of the Heart” loudly and off-key! We’re havim’ furn durmitt….
hardmannyc
and this is on QUEERty because … ? that said, you’re right about the “I’m not doing it so no one is doing it” syndrome. It’s one of the (many) things that makes AAers such bores.
adzomelk
judging by the foto i would say kik & herb have aged badly reason enough to give up @least some spirits
An Other Greek
that editorial was
sooooooooo
s
t
u
p
i
d
!!!!
Pity the desperate Times…
———————————————-
An Other Greek
BTW, comparing Cheever to Rich is way off imho
Rich is THE reasoned analysis from established media, and his perceptive, connective, and analytical abilities are at the base of a lot of our comparative positions (in the discourse of, again, mass media)… He is a treasure.
———————————————————————
alex
This one was the last straw for me. First, there was the change to the snarky, nasty articles. Next was the Gaydar disaster. Third, this hideous new look.
But…when you feel the need to swear in a article headline, I say goodbye. I’m sure I won’t be missed.
alexander
do you really sit around writing an article that criticizes people who have realized alcohol doesnt work in their lives? she didnt ask you to drink nor did she ask you “hardmann” and do you know anyone in AA, im sure you wouldnt think they are all bores. they are the people, that with and without booze, are usually the life of the party…
ggreen
Geeze I wish it would happen in San Francisco. You can’t go anywhere after sundown in SF with out running into stumbling drunks. Everywhere reeking of booze and slurring their words. Then about 10 PM it gets really lovely puking, crying and totally unfortunate. There is no “go out for a cocktail†or “have a night cap†it is all about getting fall down blackout drunk or nothing.
Charles J. Mueller
People tell me that I have a drinking problem.
I drink.
I get drunk.
I pass out.
No problem.
Actually, I make the joke. I don’t drink. lol
Charles J. Mueller
Many, many years ago, more than I care to remember actually, radio station WQXR-FM in New York City had an announcer by the name of Duncan Perney. I may be wrong about the spelling of his last name.
Duncan had an afternoon slot and he reported on fine dining places in Manhattan that he had frequented. A plug from Duncan Perney meant instant success if your establishment was lucky enough to receive a visit from him. As would be expected, all of Duncan’s food and drink was complimentary.
Mr. Perney also had a drinking problem that very often caused his speech to become slurred to the point that his faithful listeners, myself included, began to refer to him jokingly as Drunken Perney.
Kinda sad, actually.
Mr. Perney’s drinking worsened to the point that WQXR eventually fired him and I never heard anything more about him after that. I did a Google on him and came up with nothing,so I guess he is history as the expression goes.
I watched my father drink his life away too. I was 30 years old before I finally admitted to myself that my father was an alcoholic. My father was never able to admit that fact to himself.
Watching someone you love drink themselves to death, is not a pretty sight.
Casimir Kozina
LIFE OR METH, for gay men and open-minded people, is an enlightened response to
public-funded AIDS charities, whose self-serving PC
agenda and blinkered policies enable HIV and meth to thrive and destroy lives.
Meth is more addictive and destructive than heroin or crack cocaine, and a major
factor in soaring HIV rates among men who have sex with men. Unlike HIV,
however, meth can be defeated here and now: truth/knowledge is the vaccine;
empowerment is the cure.
Truth makes the user awaken to the futility of his destructive behaviour and
unravel the underlying issues that define his addiction, thereby empowering him
to break free and transform his life. By contrast, harm reduction
serves only to maintain and perpetuate meth’s
ugly grip on the user and his environment; a halfway measure and, at best, a
last resort.
Above all else, LIFE OR METH encourages all to make INFORMED CHOICES based on
the frank, non-sugar-coated facts. So choose life!!
James
Hhaahahahaha that WAS a terrible article. I’m down for abstinence if you’re an alcoholic, but i love how central to the universe Susan cheever thinks she is– if im not drinking nobody must be.. HA! Go to Williamsburg, lady, youll find your doped-up crowd. Anyway, I think she’s an idiot, she lived in my small new england hometown way back and dissed it… I’m biased…
RichardR
C’mon, Japhy and Hardmannyc, a little consideration for folks in recovery, please! Some “AAers” are bores and some not; some, like the subject of this post, are self-absorbed and others get past that. I’ve been sober for many years thanks to AA, and I love a good party. For me, there’s no problem being around drinking, but drunks? Talk about boring. Alcohol is an excellent drug — cheap, legal, its effect predictable — as long as one’s not an addict.