Obama Doesn't Want Marriage Lover Gov. David Paterson Running NY Anymore
 
 

ap_paterson_obama-thumb-400xauto-38721

President Obama gave the OK for his minions to instruct New York Gov. David Paterson to be a good Democrat and give up on a re-election campaign. It's because the White House thinks Paterson has made himself too weak politically. Or because Paterson supposedly lied to them. Either way, it's a "get off the bus" message from a man who doesn't support marriage equality to a man who does.

The White House would much rather see New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, who has high approval ratings, face off against a Republican challenger next year — which could very well be none other than former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani. The reasoning? Paterson can't win, Obama's camp claims, thanks to a series of missteps. And because Obama and Paterson are both black, it's apparently totally kosher for one to tell the other to step down without any traces of racism. (Paterson is only one of two sitting black governors.)

Or maybe all this fracas is because Paterson told the White House he would not select Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand to fill Hillary Clinton's vacant U.S. Senate seat, and then did so — leaving open a Democratic seat in the House in a Republican district. Paterson also dissed Caroline Kennedy in the press, which is a no-no in the Obama administration.

But we say: fooey. Could Cuomo be a stronger sparring partner against anti-gay Giuliani? Perhaps. But what we have in Gov. Paterson is a man who stands with his convictions about civil rights and equality. A man who demands marriage rights for a group of people he does not identify with.

It's refreshing to see such a confident American stand up for what's right. It might also make him a terrible politician. We'll soon find out: Paterson has no plans to step aside, and is mounting a re-election campaign on the Democratic ticket.

 
 
Fark Facebook Digg StumbleUpon Del.icio.us Reddit
Comments (4)

No. 1 · Robert, NYC

Republican Rick Lazio is also formally declaring that he will run for governor as early as tomorrow. Not good either. I personally love Patterson. However, if democratic AG Andrew Cuomo runs (also a supporter of same sex marriage) in 2010, he could give both Giuliani and Lazio a run for their money and could possibly beat both. If Obama doesn't at least get ENDA passed and DADT repealed, then he should be the one to pack his bags in 2012.

Posted: Sep 21, 2009 at 9:36 am
No. 2 · mikeandrewsdantescove

I would be offended if Barack told me this. Does New York not forget the terrible campaign Giuliani ran for president. Let's not pursue any of the states before Florida because they don't represent anything important.

Mike
5 Days Until the Folsom Street Fair
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSyB0f0l4is

Posted: Sep 21, 2009 at 10:05 am
No. 3 · The Swimmer

At the very least I think it is only appropriate that President Obama expend some political capital to help Paterson get gay marriage passed. I know he is against gay marriage but he was still able to make an ad against prop 8. The very least he could do is call some senators in NY and put pressure on them or bribe them. I don't know!!

Posted: Sep 21, 2009 at 7:30 pm
No. 4 · M Shane

It seems as if Obama has enough to keep his plate full without worrying about who is running New York. That just strikes me as being kind of crazy. When do presidents go around telling who to run in state elections. If he can do his own job that should be sufficient.

Posted: Sep 21, 2009 at 8:32 pm
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

By posting, you agree to our Comments Policy.

 
 
Scroll Posts
Queerty Home | Advertise | Copyright 2009 Jossip Initiatives