GRATUITOUS SKIN — From Noah’s Arc to The DL Chronicles, actor-model Karion John has been blessing a variety of screens with his chiseled physique. His latest project? Television series Friends & Lovers that, fingers crossed, we’re hoping is screen-cap worthy. (Photos: Kurt R. Brown, Tim Ricks, Steven Blank, Gregory Prescott, UNI Photography, Ruffskin)
Oh, and did we mention Karion is on Twitter? He posted this photo yesterday of him on the plane, en route to Philly for QFest:
galefan2004
That is one very beautiful man.
allancsn
This guy is amazing – the booty pics are just the best – he can rip his body fat right down and still keep a fabulous ass. He join my top ten list. mmmmmmm
TANK
LMAO! Pic 19: “she said she wasn’t on her period… LIES!!!!! DAMN LIES!!!!!!! GAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!”
Yeah, okay, very attractive. Butt, what would you do if you got something like that to go home with you? Most of you not a thing (let’s play videogames!). The rest, have pretty self conscious unfulfilling sex. He’s good looking enough to try, but to what purpose? It’d be more fun to bring pictures of him home.
Troy
I believe PIC 19 is after taking Carrie to the prom!
unclemike
@TANK: If he went home with me, I would just assume he was a bear-chub chaser, and then I would enjoy every effing nanosecond of the extremely fulfilling sex that would happen.
At 45, I don’t get self-conscious. LOL
TANK
@unclemike:
I doubt it. Unless you were paying for it, which would be likelier, though still unlikely.
unclemike
@TANK: Doubt all you want, sir. Don’t make no nevermind to me.
TANK
@unclemike:
LMAO! I realize that’s just an expression, but like irregardless, it doesn’t mean what you think it means.
unclemike
@TANK: Actually, it means exactly what I think it means.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=it+don%27t+make+no+nevermind
“Nevermind” would mean you don’t care. “No nevermind” would negate that, meaning you do care. “Don’t make no nevermind” is a double negation, meaning the original meaning is back.
Never haggle over the meaning of phrases with a teacher on vacation. 😉
TANK
@unclemike:
That would be triple negation if nevermind means “I don’t care”. Double negation would leave you with a problem.
unclemike
@TANK: No, it’s just a double negation of the original intent “nevermind/don’t care” (even though there are, indeed, three negative words in the final thang).
TANK
@unclemike:
No, it’s not a double negation of the original intent, whatever that means.
Nevermind=does not care, so affixing that with it is not the case renders, it is not the case that I don’t care=I care.
Saying, then that it is not the case that it is not the case that I don’t care=triple negation for, “I don’t care”=it is not the case that I care. Resulting in: it is not the case (1) that it is not the case (2, and meaning “I care”) that it is not the case that I care (3, back to the original, I don’t care).
Don’t mess with a logician.
Gordon
That’s it! I’m cancelling dinner plans tonight and working out instead ;-(
M Shane
I think he means a double negation of ‘nevermind,’ Tank.
You mean a triple negation of ‘mind’.
Whatever, the guy is fabulous, I can see that thjeres a fine booty there but no good exposure. not sure if that with his nose in a snatch does much for me personallly but he would have to do that at my house.
TANK
No, it’s not a triple negation of “mind”, idiot, which would just be care. The sentence is a triple negation if it’s sensible.
What’s a double negation of nevermind if it’s not a triple negation? Care to make sense of that one so that the original meaning is intact?
TANK
Christ, this isn’t something you can argue about…and yet people are trying to violate the law of noncontradiction.
TANK
@TANK:
Good luck with that, btw. You’d be better off trying to violate a law of physics.
Princess Pussyfoot
@TANK: Arguing with yourself again? “LOGICIAN” HA HA HA! You mean “what a tool I am” don’t you? Hell Mary, shallow be thy name!
Helga von ornstein
Lord I lord would I love to eat that. Pic #1 is now my wallpaper. You go boy.
And next time lets see that whole ass. I feel ripped off somewhat.
M Shane
Tank: Seems you made sense of what he was saying! language is, it seems, apart from pure logic a function of use and if we are understood . I don’t know where you got this law of noncontradiction , but it stricks me as being pragmatic like a lot of laws of physics which only work given certain paradigms. Check out Hawking.
M Shane
just fucking with you, you ‘re correct on the surface. It’s noyt like a law of Physics though more like a law of grammer+ we’re taught, logic.
You don’t sound like too much of a philosopher.
M Shane
Back to that man at hand: No. 19 · Helga von ornstein:
You took the words right out of my mouth. Indeed , I would be enraptured forever with a better reveiw of that incredible asset.(#1). Truly awesome.!
Fitz
@TANK: “LMAO! I realize that’s just an expression, but like irregardless, it doesn’t mean what you think it means.”
English is my third language, and even I know that “Irregardless” is a nonsense word.
Princess Pussyfoot
@Fitz: Honey, Miz Tank aspires to literacy. However, the only thing she’s capable of is to PERSPIRE!@M Shane: And I believe you misunderstood our Tiny Tyke Tank. She’s a “Fill Officer”, uniform queen you see.
sal(the original)
queerty,good one!!10 10 10 lol
HayYall
Tank’s career is smothered with retail.
TANK
@Fitz:
Yes, it’s terrible. But it’s in descriptive dictionaries. Prescriptive dictionaries are dying out, it seems.
TANK
@M Shane:
YOu’re confusing instrumentalism with logic, and really basic logic at that. ANd it’s annoying. What does “nevermind” mean in that context? Well, according to fat n’ old, it means “to not care” or, expressed with a pronoun “I don’t care”. Well, if you’re going to argue with me, you need to show me how “I don’t care” can’t be substituted for nevermind IN THAT CONTEXT, and then, how I don’t care doesn’t mean (more or less) “it is not the case that I care” in ordinary language.
afrolito
Gorgeous brotha.
TANK
@M Shane:
You idiot! Grammar and logic are distinct. Grammar are conventional rules that govern proper from improper use of words. Logic is how we think. While you can disagree with a rule of grammar (ending a sentence with a preposition) to do so with a law of logic is literally saying nothing meaningful.
I got the law of contradiction from him saying it is the case and not the case at the same time–and from you, too.
Princess Pussyfoot
@TANK: While you can disagree with a rule of grammar (ending a sentence with a preposition) to do so with a law of logic is literally saying nothing meaningful.
Didn’t I have to call you out on this one already in a previous post? And even though you are trying your best to pretend not to acknowledge my grinding your ass, (I know you love it!) I can hear your stubby little teeth grinding together because you’re just ACHING to post a comeback, but as always, your balls aren’t big enough to do the job. And yet,you seem to have a lot of “fans” here of the same opinion!
SMOOCHIES!
M Shane
Still at it?
It seems that you understood what you said, Tank ,as did everyone else. a variation: i.e.. “you’re mistaken if you think I’m indifferent.”
Hopefully we think more or less the way that we speak , which is not always logical, and nonetheless makes sense.
You’ve gotten got stuck someplace back with Russellian metaphysics; a long time ago before Witgenstein.
It seems strange that you can say it with confidence, not feeling like an idiot and yet claim that the statement is meaningless.
M Shane
Tank : If you think differently than you speak then you are one crafty queen. You probably think that your world has a logical structure like your thinking. Or is it your brain? Goodness ! Pussyfoot, you were right, re the “uniform” disposition.
TANK
LOL! It would be that people like you were disagreeing with what I wrote, and with words like “no” and “double negation”.
To clarify. To be logical is just to be meaningful. Natural language is not an artificial language like a logic; and thus does not need to be logical at all. A grammatically structured sentence can be meaningless. No sentence that is logical can, at the same time be meaningless. If it’s meaningless, then it nonetheless CANNOT make sense.
The rest of your idiotic ramblings don’t make any sense. You’ve never Read Russell or Wittgenstein (I can say this with complete confidence), so you don’t understand what they wrote and where they disagree (or that I disagree with both on many important points). You should read Wittgenstein. He was very smart. Start with the tractatus… someone as stupid as you won’t understand it. You need a tutorial. I suggest Max Black’s guide. It’s old, but good. YOu won’t understand it then, either…so don’t read it wittgenstein; it’d be a waste.
Taylor Siluwé
Did anyone say Bootylicious yet?! Didn’t have time to read all the comments. I might even do something evil to a good friend to get to this man. I might. Okay, maybe not a good GOOD friend. Maybe not.
M Shane
Bingo! Ludwig retracted everything he wrote in Tractatus Log. Phil.; Guess you pulled your covers! I told you that you were a burnt out Russellian. Burn that Tractatus girl ; get with it.
Read the Red and Green books; and anything that doesn’t fuck with metaphysical crackpottery. I guess that qualifies you as the booby until you study up. Till then you are clearly out of the running.
M Shane
Correction: not “Green”, but “Blue Book” sorry; I was thinking of an example.
TANK
@M Shane:
Wow, you read wikipedia, apparently. I said start with the tractatus (it’s still enormously influential). START. You haven’t read anything he’s written (from on certainty to the philosophical investigations to another masterpiece which you deride because you’re an illiterate slob…the tractatus…Anyone who is remotely interested in philosophy needs to read the tractatus. It’s a must. Not you, though…you stick to wikipedia).
TANK
Yeah, the green and red books…fuck you…seriously, just shut up. Just enough. IT’s embarrassing. To pretend to know anything about wittgenstein or philosophy, or logic. It’s very annoying.
galefan2004
@M Shane: Language is fluid not rigid. The laws change all the time with popular usage. They are constantly being reevaluated. Just look at how the sexist language went from him to him/her (with shim introduced as a failed attempt to combine the two) to eventually them (although its a plural it now became singular because its gender neutral).
galefan2004
@Princess Pussyfoot: I just so saw you channeling Miss Chi Chi Rodriguez.
TANK
Metaphysics (analytic–not retard enneagrams, religious gibberish, and magic crystal homeopathic bullshit) is taught in every respectable philosophy and undergrad program in north america, the united kingdom, and australia. However, such was the power of the logical positivists that there isn’t a class that doesn’t spend the first few weeks discussing why it should be taught. However, logical positivism is no more thanks to people like alonzo church and quine. But, metaphysics is still very respectable thanks largely to philosophers/logicians like david lewis (the best) and saul kripke–who proved quine wrong and made concept analysis respectable again. Even quine thought metaphysics when it dealt with ontology (what “to exist” means) was kosher. Enough of your amateur ravings.
TikiHead
Tank, please steer us all to the poll page, that we may vote for you in your quest to be the ‘Most Boring, Pompous, Pedantic, Thread-derailing Troll in all Blogdom!’
You so deserve to win that crown.
OH, and yep, the guy’s adorable.
Princess Pussyfoot
@galefan2004: SNAP!
Princess Pussyfoot
@TANK: This, from a fool who can’t understand proper nouns need to be capitalized! Some intellectual!
galefan2004
@Princess Pussyfoot: One of my best friends around the time I graduated high school could do the perfect imitation of Miss Chi Chi. He grew up to have a decent stint as an entertainer in Akron and even won a few pageants. He performed as a male not a drag queen though. He was Latin looking (I’m not sure if his father was Latin or not) and was just so cute doing his impression.
TANK
@TikiHead:
You don’t like python, old timer? Old man and the sea that he’s older than…you don’t care for that? Shucks. Everybody knows you don’t vote–you think it’s a “union” conspiracy.
M Shane
@Tank : You sure rely on shody language to suppliment your position. Again you give an object lesson in your own ignorance. The “Tractatus” is the epitome of Logical Posivism:the high point of metaphysics.
The movement towards concept analysis is the more humble form of philosophy directed at understanding what we actually say — inspired by Witgensteins later work..
I checked out the Wikipedia section and , I’d swear, you must have written it!
M Shane
@Tank : You sure rely on shody language to suppliment your position. Again you give an object lesson in your own ignorance. The “Tractatus” is the epitome of Logical Posivism:the high point of metaphysics.
The movement towards concept analysis is the more humble form of philosophy directed at understanding what we actually say — inspired by Witgensteins later work.. all worthwhile philosophy is about something other than spinning it’s wheels: i.e. aesthetics, jurisprudence .
BTW, I checked out the Wikipedia section and , I’d swear, you must have written it!
buttmunch
yukkkk….
TANK
@M Shane:
Logical positivism was the high point of metaphysics? LMAO! YOu keep revealing your ignorance.
TANK
And no, Quine destroyed the possibility of concept analysis providing a meaningful understanding of anything–the end of ordinary language philosophy. It’s still largely over. What Kripke did was make concept analysis respectable to a certain extent, and saved metaphysics.
Princess Pussyfoot
@TANK: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“Pompous Ass” doesn’t even begin to cover it! I don’t think I have EVER seen such pretentious, idiodic, assinine foolishness as this twerp puts out! At least I have been able to get a few days laughs out of it. Such a “deep” philosophical insight to a MODEL!!! PLEASE! Keep posting your “intelligent” discussions so that we may all be enlightened by your “superior” intellect! Oh my, I think I need a trip to the toilet… to review your monumental…thoughts! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TANK
why would you need a trip to the toilet to review my monumental thoughts? Do you review things in the toilet? Carry out correspondences? Talk to yourself? Xanax isn’t supposed to be taken anally.
Princess Pussyfoot
@TANK: I guess you’re too dense to get the joke. Because you’re full of shit, of course!
TANK
@Princess Pussyfoot:
But what does that have to do with you reviewing my monumental thoughts (your words) on the toilet? Who’s really full of shit?
Princess Pussyfoot
@TANK: Sweetheart, your “monumental” (accent on the “mental”) thoughts are nothing but shit. And everyone else seems to agree. I think it’s time you surrendered, Dorothy.
TANK
@Princess Pussyfoot:
but what this have to do with you going to the bathroom to sit on the toilet and think about my shit (literally)? Are you some kind of freak? Scat fetishist?
Dave
@TANK: Seeing what you have posted here and other recent ones, I have just one question. Why do YOU imagine everyone thinks you’re such an asshole?